this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
677 points (100.0% liked)

196

17716 readers
883 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also we Americans are pretty good at paving every square inch inch of an island. We did Manhattan and are working on doing Long Island.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You also just demolish everything every now and then because old is not the american way, while this side of the ocean tends to constantly maintain and improve on what already exists.

Glass towers tend to make a boring landscape.

[–] millie@lemmy.film 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Huh? I mean buildings get condemned or rebuilt sometimes, but talk like that tells me you haven't been to Boston or New York.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] geekworking@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Any American who lives in Hurricane prone areas can't comprehend this lasting for more than a decade at best before it is washed away clean.

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'd give it 3-4 years. Maybe five if they're sturdy, but not a decade.

And yet, we continue to live directly, knowingly in the path of multiple hurricanes every year instead of simply moving. I always thought going into the construction business around the Outer Banks must be a money cheat.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

That might be about to change now that insurance companies are tightening the purse strings in areas that see a lot of Natural disasters

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

We have very few hurricanes in Europe. Most of these houses are hundreds of years old.

That being said, rising sea levels could destroy this and lots of other towns for good.

[–] Krukenberg@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, cause drywall is so much stronger than stone

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Mad because America still has access to trees, huh.

More seriously, the coastal county near me has seen 15 hurricanes make landfall in the past 35 years. Of those, 9 have been a category 2 or higher. You guys in your latitude get little tornadoes and some half-hearted shaky-shake that barely even registers, not earthquakes and hurricanes.

Unless your windowless, single-story house composed of 8in. of reinforced, perfectly uncracked concrete comes with an identical roof like a bomb shelter, I would strongly recommend weathering it out with whichever distant family member will take you. Anything above a Cat. 1 can just rip the ceiling off and stone in an earthquake stands a chance of aerating your skull, for all the expense you put into building it.

Brick in particular is fucking terrible for this. This is one of the reasons every now and then, you'll see a stone building totalled while a wooden one down the street sits untouched. Wood's pretty flexible and natural disasters are weird.

Also, lol you live in a fancy oven you can't even renovate and you'll be dead long before I am

[–] geekworking@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

We have a lot of reinforced concrete coastal fortifications built during WWII that have been destroyed due to storms. The storms wash away the land around them, the foundation collapses, and the structure breaks.

[–] mateG@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pretty sure this is Rovinj in Croatia

[–] mordack550@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Are you even living if you can't smell your neighbor's farts?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

At least they're not smelling everyone's car's farts

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bro you got a whole plaza, an area with a bunch of trees and the sea less than 5min away by foot, at what point do these people need a park?

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Obviously these things are subjective, but a plaza is not a replacement for a park to me - neither is an area with two dozen or so trees, I need to be able to escape into a little bit of nature every now and then

The sea is definetely a big plus, but also not a park replacement - I think pointing out it's lack of a proper green area is a fair criticism, especially given the tone of the original tweet which acts like this is the peak of human living

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago

They forgot to put the foot lettuce in my burger city

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd argue the only people who don't need a park are ones that have enough room that it's redundant. Where do children run around and play? Where can you throw a ball or frisbee around or fly a kite or have a picnic etc but a park

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A) in the street because it's safe to do so

B) some views from the other side

[–] filgas08@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

you can park it outside

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GrimSheeper@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow that sure looks expensive

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Because it is! Looking online it looks like prices in this area are around €250k for a 400-600 sqft apartment. It looks like land just outside of this area goes for ~€200k for 0.2 acres, houses go for around €500k - 1.5mil, and townhomes go for around €200k. Rents in the area are fairly affordable at ~€475 per month (one bedroom city center) but the average salary is only ~€950 per month. Also the population is only ~15k.

The person who made the post in the image is comparing apples to oranges. My small-ish US town has a population of 10k and you can get 3 acres of land and a 2000 sq ft house for $250k. Gas station and grocery store are 10 min down the road by car. The average monthly wage is $3400 in this town.

Basically, the average person in the pictured town would need 22 years of their full salary to pay for a townhome while the average person in my town only needs 6 years of their full salary. The American mind may not be able to comprehend this picture, but it's not like most Croatians can live there either.

[–] spark947@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Who wants to live in the sticks though?

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Stick people

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean, Rovinj is as much the sticks as my town, it's just old and on the water. There's almost nothing there and it's only popular as a tourist destination. According to Wikipedia cars are the primary form of transportation outside the area in this picture and it's quite far from anything else. Also according to wikipedia much of the small businesses in this area shut down in the off season since it's mostly a beach tourist area. The closest major city is Pula (population 52k) which is 45 min from Rovinj. In comparison the largest city in my state is 25 min away and it alone has 20% of the population of the entire country of Croatia. All that said and living in old town Rovinj is less attainable to Croatians than my example is to Americans living in my area.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pavlov@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The way this image is jpeg'd to death I thought it was a Minecraft build

[–] faceless@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If a fire broke out that whole town is burning

[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not necessarily, those houses are mostly made of stones, cement and other similar materials. Only the roof structure and some other internal structures would use wood, which means a fire would spread much slower than if those were built like american wooden houses.

[–] faceless@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

But having such a densly populated town with no parks or any open space still isnt safe right?

I live in new york, which is very densly populated, but the city has a lot of open space so fires cant spread too much

And most american houses are made out of concrete or brick

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I believe most American homes are made from wood and drywall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

No lol. Like they literally have way less flammable materials in their homes. The sea air would damage anything flammable over time, too. Best not to have it in the first place.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 2 years ago

Good thing there's plenty of water around, then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cool but where's the parking?

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Bottom right.

Google says the town's name is Rovinj, Croatia, and Wikipedia says that, while the preferred method of getting around town is by car, the preferred method of getting around this specific part of town (the town's center, which includes the old town) is by bike or scooter, though you can also walk, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rovinj

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

It's like a less shitty Kowloon Walled City.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Honestly I love the idea of being able to easily access places just by walking but living that close to that many people would make me go insane.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only responsible response to marble statue twitter is a swift unapologetic block. The next best thing is to completely clown on them.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

The holy roman empire roots for you

[–] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Depends. Does it have any oil we could invade?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Looks like an overcrowded mess to me.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How do you number the streets? /s

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

By the metre, from the centre or the post office, accordingly. Makes sense.

It's easier than laying washing machines down in the street or drawing football fields on the road

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

It's exhausting having Europeans assume that because I live here I A) endorse everything about it with every fiber of my being and B) have no ability to conceptualize any other way of living at all, much less a better one than my current American lifestyle.

It's true we don't have a quaint medieval village on an island, but we never had invading Huns or something force us to live on a postage stamp of land and make a quaint little village there.

load more comments
view more: next ›