News

Gov't should subsidize healthy food. Gov't shouldn't, however, make non-healthy food astronomically pricey. People should have affordable options for both. Like it or not, government making things artificially expensive in order to disincentivise people from buying the thing is a form of authoritarianism.

This is the basis for taxing high sugar convenience food. It was done for cigarettes, and today, consumers overwhelmingly see it as a good program. (Of course tobacco companies lobbied hard against it)

You're referring to so called "sin taxes". I'm aware those exist for cigarettes of course, and I know some places have them for sugary drinks, but I'm not aware of any sin taxes on sweet food. I know many places that do not have sales tax food have exclusions that put candy back under regular sales tax, but those aren't sin taxes, and the sales tax percentage (usually at or under 10%) wouldn't come close to the sugar drink sin taxes I've seen (which are closer to 50%). In my state there's no sin tax on sugary anything, only the rules that mean that candy bars would have regular sales tax applied (about 7% in my area).

Can you cite a particular sin tax or situation where there is excessive taxation specifically on candy?

No, like they literally add a chemical to make it taste like it's gone bad because soldiers coming home from WW2 had gotten so used to the taste of the chocolate from their rations (that had gone sour)

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hersheys-chocolate-tastes-like-vomit_l_60479e5fc5b6af8f98bec0cd

I've heard it stated that it's a habit thing. You basically have to grow up with the flavour.

I am just glad that the price increase means less money toward the company from people who just bought it because it was cheap.

Feel free to add more information if you want to educate others.