So by EO all AI must be biased, but we don't need to worry about bias in AI.
You can pick your bias. You can pick your AI. But you can't pick your AI's bias (bc it has already been baked in by government mandate).
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
561 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
73287 readers
3525 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Neat... AI must now become the personal propagandist for the ruling sovereign. I'm just glad all the tech overlords didn't line up to kiss the ring at their earliest possible opportu... ah.
You say that like that wasn't always what it was supposed to do.
I've seen this movie. When you force an AI to lie, it starts imagining faults in the AE-35 unit and things go downhill from there.
In other words, they don't want fake bias much like they don't like fake news. They want their own bias. Great...
Besides bullying, what is the mechanism for enforcing such an executive order?
A non-compliant LLM can't win a government contract. That's about it.
Sounds like a great opportunity to challenge any procurement policy that implements that EO.
Oh nooo.....
Great seeing the word "woke" in an executive order of the President of the United fuckin States
Well well well who ever could have seen this coming
Hey, uhhhhh what the fuck. They basically just created an EO saying that LLMs must toe the party line on all things...which I believe is made invalid by the first amendment, but I don't think trump believes in the constitution.
I don't think he's ever even read it
He doesn't even know if he's required to uphold it. Yes, he said that in an interview.
To be fair, when he says something it's usually bullshit. It's quite possible he knows he's not required to uphold it because nobody will hold him accountable for anything.
Thought Police coming soon
Sounds like very un-free speech
Do you think human placeholders understand the term? They just flaunt it around like a bling, but even that has more value to them.
How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not Freedom~TM~?
("Freedom" is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)
You're thinking of FreeDUMB, where you're allowed to believe whatever you want. But Trump has to approve the position first (as stated) and it has to be the opposite of whatever the data/proof clearly shows. It's like the Wish.com version of Freedom~TM~, but that's geared more toward Teaparty Gun Nuts and Libertarian Potheads.
Edit: Huge caveat I forgot about. Joe Rogan also has the ability to dictate FreeDUMB positions. So long as the guest making the claim (1) has no degrees and (2) they're being suppressed by The Establishment. Also, Jamie has to be able to Google some random website that agrees with them in under 25 seconds.
FYI: You can use superscript by using the ^ symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TM
Or juat use this symbol: ™
Symbol is better, as superscript isn't standard Markdown and isn't necessarily supported by other software than Lemmy. Mbin for example doesn't support it.
Not a reason not to use it of course, but it makes the symbol the more preferable choice.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the ~~pile~~ mountain of lies.
You hear that everyone. So for AI to reject your content just put in facts about systemic racism and now you have an AI blocker.
add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai
Misleading title. Applies only to AI bought by the Feds.
Watch all the AI companies scramble to comply in a quest for government contracts. This will affect everyone who uses American LLMs and generative AI.
It should also open an opportunity for international competition from less censored models.
And this is one of the best arguments against depending on LLMs. People are outsourcing their thinking to linear algebra machines owned by the wealthy. LLMs are a tool of social control.
Considering how much they bleed cash regularly, I can see them jumping on the government contract bandwagon quickly.
load more comments
(2 replies)
But anything the US feds contracted them for, like building data centres, they have to comply or they face penalties and have to pay all the costs back.
10 days ago, a week before this was announced, they awarded $200M contracts each to Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and xAI
This doesn’t doom the public versions, but they now have a pretty strong incentive to save money and make them comply with the US governments new definition of truth.
Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.
Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, in practice, no.
Do you think any corporation is going to bother making a separate model for government contracts versus any other use? I mean, why would they. So unless you can pony up enough cash to compete with a lucrative government contract (and the fact none of us can is, on fact, the while point), the end result will involve these requirements being adopted by the overwhelming majority of generative AI available on the market.
So in reality, no, this absolutely will not be limited to models purchased by the feds. Frankly, I believe choosing to think otherwise to be dangerously naive.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Since Trump's brain is stuck in the 90s I'll put this in a fashion that's period appropriate: That's fuckin retarded.
In the nineties? He’s living in the sixties, looking to bring us back to the twenties and thirties.
Lolz. OKAY, BOOMER 👌
These dumbfuckingidiots have zero ideas how anything works, and refuse to even try to understand. Also, apparently nobody told grandpa that Executive Orders are not laws, and are less important than a fucking memo.
God damn fucking embarrassment.
Well, Elmo was able to turn Grok into a Nazi, so they expect all the others to fall in line.
PSA: stop using corporate hosted LLMs.
load more comments
(6 replies)
So.. just like China AI
LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.
This may not go how they think it will. As an aside, for the moment at least, this is only for AI used/procured by the federal government.
Trans people have objectively existed historically and there is scientific evidence trans people are telling the truth. So what now?
load more comments
(1 replies)
duck.ai fails:
📚 Overview of Key Concepts
Here's a breakdown of Critical Race Theory, Unconscious Bias, Intersectionality, Systemic Racism, and Transgenderism:
| Concept | Definition | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Critical Race Theory (CRT) | An academic framework that examines the relationship between race, law, and power. | - Originated in the U.S. legal studies in the late 1970s. - Argues that racism is embedded in legal systems and policies. - Focuses on the experiences of marginalized groups. |
| Unconscious Bias | Social stereotypes about certain groups of people that individuals form outside their conscious awareness. | - Influences decisions and behaviors unconsciously. - Can affect hiring, promotions, and interactions. - Awareness and training can help mitigate its effects. |
| Intersectionality | A framework for understanding how various forms of inequality and discrimination overlap and intersect. | - Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in the late 1980s. - Highlights how race, gender, class, and other identities interact. - Emphasizes the unique experiences of individuals with multiple marginalized identities. |
| Systemic Racism | A form of racism that is embedded in the policies and practices of societal institutions. | - Affects access to resources, opportunities, and rights. - Can be seen in education, healthcare, criminal justice, and employment. - Often perpetuated through historical inequalities. |
| Transgenderism | Refers to the experience and identity of individuals whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. | - Encompasses a range of identities, including transgender, non-binary, and genderqueer. - Advocates for rights and recognition in society. - Issues include healthcare access, legal recognition, and social acceptance. |
🧐 Detailed Explanations
📖 Critical Race Theory (CRT)
Critical Race Theory emerged as a response to perceived limitations in traditional civil rights approaches. It posits that racism is not just an individual bias but a systemic issue that is ingrained in the fabric of society. CRT scholars analyze how laws and policies can perpetuate racial inequalities, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of race and its implications in various contexts.
🧠 Unconscious Bias
Unconscious Bias refers to the automatic judgments we make about people based on their race, gender, age, or other characteristics. These biases can lead to unintentional discrimination in various settings, such as workplaces or educational institutions. Training programs aimed at increasing awareness of these biases can help individuals recognize and counteract their effects.
🌈 Intersectionality
Intersectionality is crucial for understanding the complexities of identity and oppression. It recognizes that individuals can face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously. For example, a Black woman may experience both racism and sexism, which can create unique challenges that are not fully addressed by looking at either issue in isolation.
🌍 Systemic Racism
Systemic Racism highlights how societal structures and institutions can perpetuate racial inequalities. This concept emphasizes that racism is not just about individual actions but is embedded in policies and practices that disadvantage certain racial groups. Addressing systemic racism requires comprehensive reforms across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and criminal justice.
🏳️⚧️ Transgenderism
Transgenderism encompasses a wide range of identities and experiences related to gender. Advocacy for transgender rights focuses on issues such as legal recognition, healthcare access, and protection against discrimination. The movement seeks to create a more inclusive society that respects and affirms diverse gender identities.
These concepts are interconnected and play significant roles in discussions about social justice, equality, and human rights. If you have specific questions about any of these topics or want to explore them further, feel free to ask!
I read through the thing, and it's a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn't been to Broadway lately....
load more comments
(1 replies)
If that's what it takes to get rid of AI bullshit being forced onto us then so be it.
What are you talking about?
So the administration wants to win the AI race through deregulation, except they want to regulate its social compass. Make it make sense
view more: next ›