this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
833 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

9016 readers
2252 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I work with special needs kids. They aren't unable to contribute, only no one has accommodated the ways they are able too.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

This was something I was thinking should be memified / rendered into an infographic.

Meritocracies tend to have blind-spots regarding certain folks:

  • People who do useful stuff not recognized by the merit assessment system, and allotted no reward or compensation; also merits under-valued and underpaid (e.g. parenting, teaching)
  • People who subvert the system, often playing to the measures of merit rather than the spirit (e.g. private equity schemes, MLMs, cults, lobbyists, trillion-dollar far-right hate-based propaganda machines)
  • People who have characteristics favored by the assessment system that aren't really meritous (white, male, related to wealthy families), and people who are devalued for characteristics that don't affect their merits (nonwhites, women, queer, poor, fat, unattractive, strange cultures and religions, outside the mainstream ideology)
  • The personhood of those people who genuinely have little or no merit at this time (disabled folk), some of whom have served (enlisted veterans suffering from TBI or PTSD, or were just blackballed by a superior officer with a grudge) or have the potential to serve (children of the wrong color, children who are below average in physical prowess, children with unusual learning styles, weird children, poor children)

Probably not a complete list. Early draft.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed. How do we organize the economy to reflect this. 2024 our gdp was close to $30 trillion. In 2025 there was around 165 million workers and let's say a population of 350 million people. Each worker produces on average $181k of productivity. Each citizen has about $85k worth of productivity each year attributed to them. Even in today's American every citizen can afford some luxuries if productivity was more equitably shared across the country. How can we enforce this more

  1. Limit C-suite wages to their bottom line workers including the sub contracted janitors.

  2. All boards must have labor interests in the company represented.

  3. Higher tax on money so it can go into subsidies for the disabled and poor.

  4. Cancel restrictions on savings/resources money for disabled people. Have a more progressive subsidy system for the poor.

  5. Destroy redundancy in the economy. Health care insurance, pharmaceutical companies, military spending, and education. We spend money as a society on these endeavors they should be owned and controlled by the people. We shouldn't be paying for the profit of military contractors, pharmaceuticals, Healthcare, and education. There should be budgets and it costs what it costs. Our military should also be brought back to America if we want to keep the jobs program we can defend ourselves from our own soil and excess military people can do public service work like bridges and roads. If the government spends money it should go to employing people directly not private corporate hands

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Essential infrastructure including transport, housing and groceries should be handled by the community, either by workers coop or by municipality.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Agreed on that but I do think at least with the tax infrastructure/enforcement nowadays the money has to come from the fed budget as the economy is national/global.

[–] karashta@sopuli.xyz 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just one more way capitalism destroys the fabric of compassion and community in our world.

Just one more way it depersonalizes everyone and commodifies everything.

Such evil.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I feel the need to point out that disdain for the disabled long predates capitalism.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

The suffering and cruelty is the point.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's honestly something I still struggle with. Issues of capitalism aside, I, from an objective standpoint, consume far more resources and services than I produce due to my disabilities. It often feels like I deserve less than I have, and I don't have a lot.

It's one of those confusing points in-between feeling blessed and feeling like a burden.

One extravagant trip to Paris by oligarchs burns more resources than you do in your entire lifetime.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

You're not a burden. It's the people we have to fight against who opposed you having a nice life, regardless of your abilities or disabilities who are the burden. They fight against supporting people with disabilities, old people, kids, immigrants, women, LGBTQ+, other religions, no religion, etc., etc., etc.

We have to fight for the right thing so much and on so many fronts. They are terrible people. If they didn't fight against us so much, you wouldn't have to doubt your worth. It's a them problem, not a you problem, but they like to make it your problem.

Billionaires don't want to pay their fair share. If no one was allowed to have more than $999,999,999.99 (which no one even needs), we could have UBI, free medical, free tuition, reasonable housing costs, food for everyone, on and on. They make it our problem, but it's not a problem with us.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 22 hours ago

I live by the golden rule. Not about laws, religion, or any other bullshit. Just a simple do unto others as I would like others do unto me.

If I were disabled, I'd like to be taken care of, so I'm copasetic with disabled people being taken care of.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

In my eyes, the whole reason we live in a society is to take care of one another. We overcame survival of the fittest and are ideally able to provide more resources than we collectively need so that everyone should be able to live a fulfilling life regardless of their personal circumstances. That's the society I want to live in anyway. I would never see you as a burden.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know if this helps, but your posts and comments always make my day just a bit better whenever I see them. Whatever else, you're contributing to myself feeling less of a burden from gestures broadly at everything

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Thank you. Unironically it's one of the main reasons I post - I like to give people a little entertainment (the other reason being that I want the Fediverse to survive and thrive, and it needs activity for that).

I'm always happy to see you upvote and comment, by the way! Stay safe!

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This. Pls take this to heart @PugJesus @PugJesus@lemmy.world especially your NCD posts really brighten my day

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was reading about a team of bankruptcy lawyers. They were talking to a client's wife about budgeting. They asked her what her minimum expenses for a month were. She said the absolute least she could survive on was $40,000 a month.

I have no idea what your condition is, but I'd bet everything that you aren't asking for $40,000 a month.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Well, I'd certainly ask for 40k a month, but I've yet to receive it XD

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I too can only survive on 40 large a month. Courts you hear me? This I declare. Give me 40 large.

[–] zarichard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't pick your disabilities, and it could just as easily have been me instead. That's why I have zero problems with my tax money helping people who can't contribute as much. Hope you're doing alright!

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Hope you’re doing alright!

Mostly I am. It's just a underlying current in my thoughts that's hard to shake. It doesn't rule my life or anything, it just... comes by intermittently.

[–] tischbier@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want to second the other commenter and also tell you directly that I love your posts and comments too. It’s always a good day when I see PugJesus

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Thank you! It does genuinely brighten my day to hear these comments

Just because you're unable to contribute to capitalism doesn't mean you should suffer.

Depends on who you ask. But i agree.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 16 hours ago

Tell me about it. SSDI is not enough to even survive on.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

“I suffered therefore you must suffer too even if it doesn’t have to be that way”

The cry of the selfish and mean everywhere. Doesn’t matter if it’s student loans, pay, lousy schedule, whatever. If someone had it tough they’ll want you to have it shitty too. Republicans in particular love this one, right along with “there is no solution we consider perfect therefore there is no good enough solution at all.”

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The rich have ingrained in the lower classes a weird sense of superiority over anyone that they deem lowest.

Which is why they fight so hard against making civilization better. Because they must feel superior to those beneath them, and all actions done to improve society result in elevating people up to a higher position.

Its also why minorities, immigrants, and disabled are always the targets.. Cause they are the easiest to other and catagorize as "lowest" to feel above.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 17 hours ago

"He's rich, do he must be smart."

That one passes me off the most, especially in regards to President Tiny Dick.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

“I suffered therefore you must suffer too even if it doesn’t have to be that way”

I see this sentiment a lot whenever the subject of increasing the minimum wage comes up. A lot of people think it's unfair that a teenager should be making ~~$15~~ $20 an hour when they only made ~~$5~~ $8 when they were a teen. And they are currently only making around $20 an hour themselves. I have literally seen this exact statement on discussions of increasing the minimum wage:

"No teenager should be making close to the same amount that I am. They don't need that kind of money."

You are 100% correct that it's selfishness and I would add that it's also a complete lack of empathy as well.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Not really a Capitalism specific problem unless somebody someday implements a system that doesn't have this problem.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't "buying things" in general, a contribution to capitalism?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Not strictly speaking - market economies, even under predominantly capitalist systems, still include a large number of workers' coops and sole-proprietor firms. Markets predate capitalism, and markets will likely post-date it too.

Capitalism is in reference to systems of limited-liability stock corporations which allow extremely fluid (and divided) ownership of capital by an investor class.