I would imagine a lot of Labour voters preferred Corbyn to Starmer on almost every metric.
UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
because corbyn actually shows up to work
Hey! Starmer shows up!
When paid enough by the fascist Israeli apartheid government, Lombard Street, and his other owners, that is.
Corbyn stands for something, he got a raw deal that he was in a leadership role during panto season.
Probably due to the fact Labour deserted the working class and fascists used the opportunity to blame immigrants with populist lies.
Corbyn speaks to working class people about the real lived experience and genuinely means it.
Working people need to be treated with respect and governments if ignore them at their peril. Blair was wrong that they have nowhere to go so it's fine to ignore them. Starmer is wrong to re-run that playbook.
Party whose founding premise seems to be based on "Fuck the current guy" says "fuck the current guy". More at 11
Reform voters should self-immolate.
Maybe tou should read the article and understand why people are drawn to Reform. Starmer is just trying to be Farage light, so it's no wonder nobody likes him.
Closer to Alexander than Farage.
An authoritarian bootlicking shitbag as opposed to a racist, opportunist prick.
Though I suppose there's some overlap.
The article literally talks about how Starmer's attempta at courting racists is backfiring on him
Yes, but I don't think it's because he's angling for a social group that's into doing a bunch of hate crimes.
It's much more likely he's doing it for political reasons.
I could be very wrong however.