this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

archeology

95 readers
191 users here now

Everything about old history and how to get information about old time

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The absolute ugliness of religion.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The title is so wildly misleading. Most of these sacrificial virgins and their families were there willingly, as their proud way to help preserve their civilization and the favour of the gods. The drugs were there to help them to go without much pain, these weren’t kids who were put up there as punishment, their sacrifice would have been honoured by everyone

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is that misleading? Them being sacrificial virgins doesn't make the act of drugging them and leaving them to freeze to death better.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not to us, modern 2025 people, to them and their culture it means all the difference. Can’t judge people in the ancient world through our modern morality. To you, the idea of drugging your child and leaving them on a mountain sounds like abuse, to them this was an honour.

This girl would have been treated like a queen and fed the best foods and had the best care leading up to her sacrifice. And to them that was a proof of their respect for her sacrifice

[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

You are not wrong on that account, but you are wrong on the account that the title is misleading. It is actually quite correct and precise. It doesn't say the children were abused, or anything contrary to what you are describing. They were drugged and left to die.