this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
979 points (95.2% liked)

politics

25936 readers
1904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Ukraine got Zelensky. We deserve Jon.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (37 children)

Oh Jesus more celebrities in politics is the last thing you guys need

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

John Stewart is probably the only one I could actually get behind.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So finaly, you will get Stewart instead of King

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People really think there will be an election in 2028?

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 17 points 1 month ago

Well either way, ya'll better be showing up somewhere when we're supposed to be voting

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

I mean, ideally we shouldn't be just running celebrities but after 8 months of this shit I don't give a fuck anymore. Mentally I am here:

If it works I literally could not care less. Clearly the people want vibes so let's just give them the fucking vibes and deal with THAT issue when things aren't actively on fire.

Whatever else Stewart is, he's knowledgeable, charismatic, willing to fight for a cause, and DOES genuinely seem to give a fuck about the average person. That's a damn good start at least.

And all of THAT is even under the assumption we get something at least vaguely resembling a normal election, which at this point I think is entirely dependent on when exactly Diddler on the Roof finally strokes out on the shitter.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Venn diagram overlap of personality characteristics of modern politicians and celebrities is extraordinarily large. Pure charisma drives success in modern media-driven politics. It's sad, but I believe it's truth now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just an interesting observation I've had about the comments here: everyone against this is misspelling his name

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yes. He would make the hard choices we would understand we needed to make. Not the choices of self-preservation most all politicians make.

Edit: would we be willing to sacrifice him to force him into the position? It would probably wreck the man…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Fucking yes. YES.

I wish he ran against Joe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›