GrapheneOS

742 readers

13 users here now

An unofficial discussion community for anyone interested in GrapheneOS.

Helpful links:

Official Graphene OS Discussion Forum

List of official Matrix channels and other contact sources.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

wxboss@lemmy.sdf.org

[Question] Will Pixel 8/9/10 be supported for long term? A question on the future of GrapheneOS. (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 3 weeks ago by cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de to c/graphene_os@lemmy.sdf.org

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I read about Google's decision of not releasing the firmware source code going forward. Is it still the case? If it is, should one purchase any Pixel 8/9/10 series in hope of keeping it for a long time?

I am planning to purchase a new Pixel 9 (used ones are not an option unfortunately) during the Black Friday or something. It will be a substantial amount but I am hoping it will be justified with amortisation.

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find a clear cut answer in the forums.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm using a pixel 7 pro. I'm feeling absolutely no reason to upgrade.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 weeks ago

I'm on a 5, and will be until this hardware fails.

[–] DesolateMood@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It will. Graphene said in a mastodon post that they will continue to support existing devices including pixel 10.

Keep in mind that they are currently working with a "major OEM" (details to come I'm sure) on their own device and predict that it'll be ready in a year or two, so if you feel like you can survive that long with your current phone it could be worth to try. If not, then yes current devices are still and will still be supported

[–] chokidar@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Any intelligent guesses as to who the OEM might be?

[–] DesolateMood@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the original thread they didn't seem too interested in working with most manufacturers. The only name I saw that they were interested in was framework, which is what I'm hoping for. And I think it makes some amount of sense that it's someone not currently in the phone market, after all the reason that pixels are the only supported devices is because literally nobody else meets their standards

[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

crosses fingers i hope it's framework, i would buy into that.

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What's framework?

Did a quick internet search, and I see the concept of a "framework phone", but I'm not seeing it as a brand. Can you link to what you mean?

[–] Mesophar@pawb.social 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not OP, don't know for sure, but assuming they mean the Framework computers company https://frame.work/

[–] DahGangalang 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmm, they don't seem to (currently) make smart phones.

I do like the philosophy they seem to be promoting though, so if grapheme can make that happen, I'd love to get in on it all.

[–] DesolateMood@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes framework the computer the company. This is what I was talking about in my comment when I said they're likely working with someone who's not currently in the market

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, that makes sense. Appreciate the follow up!

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 weeks ago

The future “graphene phones” might also be the hardware linux mobile distros need to start maturing

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

I can't find their post (I imagine it's somewhere on their mastodon) but I think they said that the released source code was basically a 'nice to have' and shouldn't affect their future support.

Their FAQ still implies everything's OK, hopefully it stays that way.