this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
847 points (99.1% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7938 readers
100 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35684522

Despite his support for Trump, Ragland has become increasingly vocal about the need for immediate trade resolution. “We desperately need to get something rectified quickly with China, our biggest export customer,” he told CNN. “We wanna encourage the administration to get a proactive trade deal done.”

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Arrogant dickheads.

China has reached the point it can afford to say no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Got what you voted for. It’s ok, they have insurance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Most soy goes to livestock feed, and most of that goes to poultry.

Only 20% goes to human consumption, with most of that going to oil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Knightfox@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

All I have to say is get fucked loser

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

During Trump's last term when he fucked over soybean growers, at least locally in my rural community, the soybeans didn't go to waste. They didn't rot in the fields or in storage. However, farmers ended up having to sell for way less than normal, and basically they didn't make any profit (many even saw losses) that year.

This issue with this year, again I can only speak to my area, is that by the time Trump was elected, most people would have already placed their orders for seed and the specific chemicals/supplies they needed for soy, so they're on the hook for it. They would have been facing the decision to take a sure loss (ex: if they didn't plant the soy they've already purchased and/or if they had to go procure some other crop seed and related supplies) OR they could go ahead as planned with the soy and hope for the best.

Where I live, most farmers aren't "soy farmers", they're just farmers. They rotate crops from year to year on a pretty rigid schedule, so one year it's soy, next might be corn, grains following that, then cover crop / hay. So, they better hope the weather holds up next year for whatever crop they were planning because I doubt a lot of them will be able to tolerate multiple years of essentially no profit.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Hope they starve to death on a bed of rotting soy

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Seen ✓✓

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Grab yer pitchforks n torches, frankenorange must die

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago

If the Supreme Court won’t issue a verdict, maybe, just maybe, the people who produce our food will.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly might be really nice if we can decrease agricultural land usage. Might even cut back on red meat importing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›