this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Climate Crisis, Biosphere & Societal Collapse

1677 readers
3 users here now

A place to share news, experiences and discussion about the continuing climate crisis, societal collapse, and biosphere collapse. Please be respectful of each other and remember the human.

Long live the Lützerath Mud Wizard.

Useful Links:

DISCORD - Collapse

Earth - A Global Map of Wind, Weather and Ocean Conditions - Use the menu at bottom left to toggle different views. For example, you can see where wildfires/smoke are by selecting "Chem - COsc" to see carbon monoxide (CO) surface concentration.

Climate Reanalyzer (University of Maine) - A source for daily updated average global air temps, sea surface temps, sea ice, weather and more.

National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center (US) - Information about ENSO and weather predictions.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Global Temperature Rankings Outlook (US) - Tool that is updated each month, concurrent with the release of the monthly global climate report.

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System - Government of Canada

Surging Seas Risk Zone Map - For discovering which areas could be underwater soon.

Check out our sister sub for collapse-related memes and silly stuff, Faster Than Expected!
AKA
c/fte@supoli.xyz

Alternative community on Reddthat

If there are any links you think are important that should be added to the list, please send a message and let me know.

Thanks for coming to c/collapse!

This is a supoli.xyz community.
SUPOLI GENERAL RULES:

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Supoli FAQ

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of theClimate Desk collaboration.

In the wake of the Trump administration’s announcement that it will overturn the rule which underpins virtually all US climate regulations, a Senate committee has launched an investigation into a suspected lobbying push that led to the move.

On Tuesday, the Senate environment and public works committee sent letters to two dozen corporations, including oil giants, think tanks, law firms, and trade associations. The missives request each company to turn over documents regarding the 2009 declaration, known as the endangerment finding, which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said in July that it will unmake.

The finding enshrined that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases harm the health of Americans. “Rescinding the endangerment finding at the behest of industry is irresponsible, legally dubious, and deeply out of step with the EPA’s core mission of protecting human health and the environment, and the American public deserves to understand your role in advancing EPA’s dangerous decision,” wrote Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I,), the ranking member of the committee. “I am concerned about the role that fossil fuel companies, certain manufacturers, trade associations, polluter-backed groups, and others with much to benefit from the repeal of the endangerment finding—including your organization—played in drafting, preparing, promoting, and lobbying on the proposal.”

Fossil fuel companies and their allies are threatened by the endangerment finding because it confirms in law that carbon dioxide, which their products produce, are dangerous, Whitehouse told the Guardian. It also gives the EPA the authority to regulate those emissions under the Clean Air Act.

The letter, which asks for all relevant private communications between the day Trump was re-elected in November to the day the EPA announced plans to rescind the endangerment finding in July, was sent to oil giants ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP, as well as coal producers, a rail giant, and two auto manufacturers whose business plans rely on fossil fuels.

“The only interests that benefit from undoing the endangerment finding are polluter interests, and specifically fossil fuel polluter interests,” Whitehouse said.

“The fossil fuel industry owns and controls the Trump administration on all matters that relate to their industry.”

The letter was also sent to trade associations and law firms representing big oil and auto companies. And it was sent to far-right, pro-fossil fuel think tanks Competitive Enterprise Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance, the Heartland Institute, America First Policy Institute, and the Heritage Foundation, each of which challenge the authority of federal agencies, and some of which have directly praised the proposed endangerment finding rollback.

The Guardian has contacted each recipient for comment.

Because Republicans control the Senate, Democrats on the environment and public works committee lack the power to subpoena the documents. But the Senate committee still expects the companies to comply with their request.

The letter could send a signal to polluting sectors and right-wing firms that they are being watched and could set the stage for continued investigation if Democrats win back a congressional chamber in next November’s midterm elections.

Fossil fuel interests pushed back on the endangerment finding when it was first written, yet little is known about more recent advocacy to overturn it. Immediately following the EPA’s announcement of the rollback, the New York Times reported that groups have not “been clamoring in recent years for its reversal.” But Whitehouse believes that has changed since Trump was re-elected in November.

When Joe Biden was president and Democrats controlled at least one chamber of Congress, Whitehouse said “a request to rescind the endangerment finding would have just looked like useless, pointless, madness.”

“But now that they can actually do it in their desperation and with the mask of moderation pulled off, I think it’s very clear that they were directing this happen,” he said.

Under Trump, former lobbyists and lawyers for polluting industries such as oil, gas and petrochemicals have entered leadership positions at the EPA. “The fossil fuel industry owns and controls the Trump administration on all matters that relate to their industry, and they have subservient Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate,” said Whitehouse. “The change in power has allowed a change in tactics and attitude.”

Two environmental nonprofits have sued the Trump administration for “secretly” convening a group of climate contrarians to bolster its effort to topple the endangerment finding.

The EPA’s proposed undoing of the crucial legal conclusion comes as part of a larger war on the environment by the Trump administration, which has killed dozens of climate rules since re-entering the White House in January.

“The motive is to help fossil fuels survive,” said Whitehouse.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PhilipTheBucket I emailed the PR person at the committee to get clarification on who sent the letter, the entire committee or just the dems; if the latter, the letter is a toothless paper tiger , nothing more then theater for gullible democratic voters, IMO

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hey, that's a really good point, the last time "gullible Democratic voters" took power, the guy they put in charge did spend about half a trillion dollars on various climate actions, the biggest single action on climate change probably that ever has happened. It moved the needle significantly (although Trump is now undoing a bunch of that stuff). Of course, it's not enough, but that is precisely why it would have been a good idea to continue and accelerate it instead of taking a hard right turn and deciding to move materially in the exact opposite direction.

Gullible Democratic voters electing Democrats really does have a material impact on the climate, and I'm glad you brought it up, so thank you.

[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PhilipTheBucket I'm not sure I understand your post, but it doesn't seem to reflect what I wrote

Yes, Biden and the Dems handed out enormous sums of money that, probably did or would have helped with climate change; I'll stipulate to that

but we are talking about today; a letter from the minority party is a toothless thing, that , based on the last few months will at best be ignored and at worst be mocked by Fox

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, Biden and the Dems handed out enormous sums of money that, probably did or would have helped with climate change; I'll stipulate to that

Thanks for bringing up also that they took massive action on union support and strengthening domestic manufacturing which actually produced some improvement in working-class wages, which is basically un heard of in this country for a US president. I'm glad you keep bringing up factual elements which are important for people to know, so so many people just tend to fall back on lazy stereotypes and talking points in order to make sense of what's going on in Washington, I'm glad to see you not falling into that common pattern.

[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PhilipTheBucket I think most of the real (inflation adjusted) wage gains for working class were due to bipartisan covid relief money

Biden did try to do a lot re Unions, etc, but not sure much happened, eg SCOTUS or Judges like R Connor issueing nationwide TROs

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think most of the real (inflation adjusted) wage gains for working class were due to bipartisan covid relief money

Incorrect, this was a lot more what caused it. Covid relief money stopped in September 2021, and its overall impact (in pretty much every country across the globe) was a massive spike in inflation as an after-effect. The US under Biden recovered from it better than pretty much any country in the world.

[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PhilipTheBucket I think, not sure that your source says that Covid relief drove wage changes for low income workers

the source doesn't far as I can tell, mention IRA or CHIPS

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Fair enough. Here's one that talks about Biden's policies and impacts a little more specifically:

https://archive.is/20240419210514/https://www.vox.com/24134257/biden-economy-inflation-wages-interest-rate

[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PhilipTheBucket

you have not acknowledged that there is a lack of clarity in the original source: is the "letter" from the whole committe or just from the ranking member ?

surely you know enough to know that this is a big deal, right ?

right ?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Everyone knows if the Democrats in this committee weren't a bunch of fakers, they would have super-powered their way into reducing carbon emissions directly, even though they're not in power. It's not enough that the last time they were in power, they worked hard and managed to trim half a billion tons per year of CO₂e from US emissions. In order not to be frauds, they need to do it when they're not in power also. Glad to hear from you bringing a much needed reality check to these proceedings.

[–] failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to -4 points 1 month ago

@PhilipTheBucket This sounds totally wrong
The guardian doesn't say it fhe letter was sent by the minority party, the dems, or sent by the whole committee

a really really key omission