this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Biology

3054 readers
19 users here now

This is a general community to discuss of all things related to biology!

For a more specific community about asking questions to biologists, you can also visit:

/c/askbiologists@lemmy.world

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lots of people are excited about the idea of using plants to help us draw down some of the excess carbon dioxide we've been pumping into the atmosphere. It would be nice to think that we could reforest our way out of the mess we're creating, but recent studies have indicated there's simply not enough productive land for this to work out.

One alternative might be to get plants to take up carbon dioxide more efficiently. Unfortunately, the enzyme that incorporates carbon dioxide into photosynthesis, called RUBISCO, is remarkably inefficient. So, a team of researchers in Taiwan decided to try something new—literally. They put together a set of enzymes that added a new-to-nature biochemical cycle to plants that let it incorporate carbon far more efficiently. The resulting plants grew larger and incorporated more carbon.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I can see a super productive version of algae being released into the oceans to solve our co2 problem.

And I wonder how long until the vast majority of the biosphere would collapse because of it.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 3 months ago

Dunno, weed on steroids being even more proficient at outcompeting local florae?

[–] Arkthos@pawb.social 3 points 3 months ago

Honestly doesn't seem like a terrible idea. Yeah reducing our emissions is better but frankly I do not have faith that is going to happen, certainly not to the extent that would be needed.

Of course we are playing with fire here, but if we can also ensure these plants are bad at naturally propagating then I guess we should be ok.