this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
107 points (99.1% liked)

News

32597 readers
2738 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 14 hours ago

fisherman=terrorist to hesgeth

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I don’t care about going to Heaven but times like these I really hope there’s a Hell because I can’t stand the thought of these people doing what they’re doing with impunity.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago

even worst, just shunt them to purgatory to make them wonder if they can go to either, since christains are so obssesed with going to either.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 16 hours ago

Hell is too good for them and would kick them out to somewhere darker.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They are posting all the evidence of their crimes on social media.

This is how certain they are that they cannot be stopped.

This is a dictatorship and it must be taken down.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I mean I’ll be honest, I also think they are just some of the dumbest people you would ever know, so I’m not too surprised they are openly posting this stuff online for the world to see.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So where's the evidence?
Also I wasn't aware that drug trafficking carries a death sentence, without a lawyer and a Jury.
USA is itself acting as a terrorist nation without a doubt, whether the people killed were smugglers or not.
USA is a rogue nation with no regard for the law, either international or domestic.
On my side the boycott of everything American continues.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 11 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Did you notice that Trump called them "unlawful combatants" in this article? That phrase may ring a bell.

George W. Bush's cronies invented the phrase during his reign of terror, or as he called it, his war on terror. He said that there were people who were neither enemy combatants, nor civilians. They were a third category: Unlawful Combatants. The conventions that protect prisoners of war did not apply to such _unlawful _ combatants. Such people could be arrested, indefinitely detained, tortured, or even killed without charge or trial. This was the justification for G. W. Bush's extraordinary rendition program that had U.S. agencies kidnapping people off the streets of the US and other nations and shipping them to black sites where they could be tortured indefinitely.

The repeated use of the phrases unlawful combatant and narco-terrorist tells me all I need to know about where they plan to go with this.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Unlawful combatant isn't something they made up, it's a legit part of the Geneva conventions on warfare.

However, as always, the USians are abusing the term and redefining it - kind of like what Israel is doing to antisemitism.

Unlawful combatants are people waging war not clearly identified on their uniforms as being of that-and-that army. This was meant to catch saboteurs, spies, infiltrators, etc., but is abused to target civians (usually a big no-no).

Unlawful combatants aren't given almost any protection by the aforementioned conventions, meaning they can be tortured or summarily executed.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Point of clarification. No protection from Geneva conventions is not lack of any protection. Geneva conventions forbade certain acts and weapons, regardless of the target. This includes torture and sexual violence. Combatant status also doesn't preclude other protections like fundamental human rights protections. You still shouldn't be summarily executed or tortured due to combatant status.

Using subterfuge and deception is perfectly lawful. Otherwise basic stuff like camouflage would be war crimes. But that's not what unlawful combatant is about. Terrorism is always unlawful, for example, because the main target is civilians in order to cause, well, terror. It doesn't matter if the terrorists were using their club's pin badge that day or not. Similarly, if you are a civilian in civilian clothes and take up a rifle to shoot at a party in an armed conflict, congratulations, you just became a lawful combatant. You became a lawful combat target, your Hawaiian shirt notwithstanding.

You're an unlawful combatant if you're targeting protected classes, like civilians, wounded, prisoners, health care personnel, etc. Even if you're clearly in your new uniform with fresh new tags. Clothing is a secondary aspect. The main defining feature is always role and behavior. Like, creating a combat unit of snipers specialized in targeting journalists, that would be a group of unlawful combatants.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago

he called them enemy combatants.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

To Chicago. They plan to go to Chicago with this, and then NYC, and then LA, and then every blue city in America...until all anyone sees is red.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a discussion recently where someone said they hope international journalists would independently verify they are actually targeting smugglers - only to realize that the US would probably target the journalists vessels, kill the journalists and then accuse them of smuggling drugs after the fact.

[–] Aedis@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Has the US killed any journalists yet? I know that they roughed some up to the point of landing them in the hospital, but I haven't heard of any deaths.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 5 points 20 hours ago

The greatest and most prestigious award in journalism is being murdered by the CIA. Lots of laureates, sadly.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can only think of one terrorist entity in this news story.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 21 hours ago

"narco-terrorists" is such a stupid conversation ending thing to call someone I can't believe it isn't parody.

[–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why did he stop at 4? Surprised he didnt say it was more

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

The fourth one literally just happened yesterday. They have not stopped at four.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I'm sure they were narco-pedo-terrorists, but Ted Cruz asked him to remove the pedo part.

Look man just because drugs are verboten here in Nazi America doesn't mean they aren't welcome in awesome mccool countries. How did they determine that these were bound for the US? Rude of them to interfere with the free market on getting high as fuck.