Because this way you'll never know if it's just inflation or an ever growing markup.
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
43 points (87.7% liked)
Ask Lemmy
34926 readers
954 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
An even more concerning question to me is why shops charge jeff bezos the same amount for something as a homeless guy. His money is clearly worth much, much less, being 99.999% stolen, and should be treated as such.
Because value itself is arbitrary. It's not like time or physics. Value is not an inherent property of the universe.
You're on to something: the 2% inflation target is just an arbitrary value.
It means your salary is constantly going down for doing the same work - you have to stay on the treadmill just to stay in place.
But if you're an asset holder then the prices of your holdings appreciate indefinitely, and governments get the power to levy this constant invisible tax on the workers.
Mark Blyth is an expert on the topic: https://youtu.be/GXBSNCysxiA
Nothing has constant value
Yea nothing is constant I know. Asking more like why don't we measure the value of things with someone that holds its value better like gold? It's physically scarce and cannot be manipulated because it's verifiable at an atomic level, and will always be in demand.
Everyone used to tie their money to gold. Not anymore.
https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2011/04/27/135604828/why-we-left-the-gold-standard
https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2017/november/why-us-no-longer-follows-gold-standard
I'm not saying we should have a gold standard again, there were obviously bad downsides. I'm questioning why we measure everything in money which loses its value over time due to inflation. Can't we measure things in something that has a more stable value while also not having a gold standard?
If money became worth more over time, there'd be an incentive to hoard it, which in turn would make it scarcer in circulation and worth more. Of course it's more complicated in real life, and the cycle would eventually break, but that's the gist of why deflation (what that is called) is seen as a bad thing.
Minor inflation is pretty harmless. Exactly 0 change in the value of money might be good too, but it's right next to deflation. So, the usual target amount is a percent or two of inflation per annum, to be safe. Central banks achieve this primarily by lending money out, at a higher or lower rate of interest as conditions demand.
It does become worth more if you hoard it. They call that interest.
No, you have to lend it to someone else for that, who probably spends it. And it never really matches what it would be doing if invested, and if it's something like a savings account the interest you earn might even be less than the inflation rate. There's a whole logic to this.
Collection of interest and profit from investments definitely are included in the reasoning of central banks.
Because it's convenient to trade said object for that something instead of carrying around a scale and silver pieces.
Also I'm not sure how much the previous metal prices fluctuates but currency may just be more stable.
Value is subjective. Everyone values different things, and to different degrees.
Cause it allows you to have a Ponzi scheme in which you always assume the future will be more prosperous.
If money loses its value, that puts pressure on people with money to use it and try to turn it into more.
So unless your willing to lose money due to inflation, you HAVE TO get a return on your investment, thereby ensuring perpetual growth.
It works well when there is tons of room to grow, but then it all falls apart when you run out of that.
Once that happens, you just keep increasing the money supply, allowing capital holders to increase at a faster rate than workers. Even though workers “make more”, they have a smaller share of the pie.
What if inflation isn't about the money losing value, but you having access to more money and thus spending it more frivolously?
banana for scale
Objectively, I'd say its about Relativism.