this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

665 readers
1069 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Civ V? At this time of year? Located entirely in this community?! I can't believe what I am seeing.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

Who said you were allowed to see it?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 35 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Even by classic Greek standards, Spartans were kind of lame (as far as we can tell nowadays). Their fighters weren't even that good, they were never able to obtain hegemony in Greece because no one wanted to ally with them (everyone fucking hated them), they didn't have the necessary economic power to buy themselves to the top, and their numbers dwindled to nothing because of their extreme classism - they would literally rather die out than allow people of lesser social status to become full citizens and thus allowed to become Spartan warriors.

And yet somehow, it was the classic Greeks themselves who started the Sparta fetishization.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

AFAIK, they didn't consider themselves greek (and possibly weren't). They were surrounded by enemies outside the walls, and their slaves, the majority of the population, came from outside their walls. The superiority complex coupled with the paranoia didn't make them great neighbors.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, it makes total sense for today's toxic "alpha" males to rever them.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"Wow, they REALLY oppress the poors, even more than we do! So cool! I wish our poors didn't have any rights!" - Other Greek Aristocrats, Probably

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It would seem that both people with very little agency over their own lives and people with unfettered access to multiple types of agency (money, power, influence) love the idea of a society of "strong-men".

For the first group it's an escapist "utopian" fantasy to them and for the second it's a high-risk high-reward strategy to make their numbers go up.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

spearmen

spearmen good

Kronk

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Multiculturalism, religious tolerance, an impressive degree of self determination for the time period, governing through bureaucracy and taxes...

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 5 hours ago

Spartans, of course, never wanted to conquer anything.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

I don't know much about the historical analysis, but rhetorically the Persians could certainly have been more in line without being perfect.