this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
172 points (90.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35034 readers
2499 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 106 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Owls don't weigh 16 pounds (except for fat owls). 300 kilowatts is a rate of energy, not a total quantity of energy. 300 kilowatt hours (which is possibly what they meant?) Is only around 260,000 kilocalories (which is called "calories" on food labels because units of measure were made up by humans). According to an extremely naive google search, that would only take an owl 5 years to consume, rather than 10. If the original number were correct, that would mean this owl eats 8,000 calories per day. Which is not typical.

Onto the broader point, the efficiency of birds in flight is not as simple as this image suggests. There is no (useful) formula that takes the weight of a bird and the distance it will fly and tells you how many calories that takes. Birds can fly at different elevations, at different speeds. They can fly with or against the wind. They can change many things about how they fly to be more efficient or less efficient.

If you really want to know how many calories it takes for an owl to cross the ocean, first get the owl to the point of starvation, then bring it on a boat to the middle of the ocean. Feed it a fixed number of Tootsie pops, then sink the boat. With nowhere else to land, the owl will be forced to fly to shore. Based on how far the owl makes it, you can determine how far each tootsie pop allowed it to fly, and derive calories per mile from that.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There are flying rates for owls, like the barn owl is 80 km/h. Flying from NA to Europe wouldn’t even take more than 100 hours (60 from Boston to Lisbon), so with that it would mean the bird would be spending 3kW of energy, which is just nonsensical.

All birds have a kJ/d amount, and even with a huge multiplier you wouldn’t come anywhere near the amount in the meme.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Who are thee, who is so wise in the ways of science?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

PLEASE DON'T starve the owl! There is another way: metabolism rate is proportional to the number of O₂ + hydrocarbons → CO₂ + H₂O reactions in the body, which can be measured as the amount of CO₂ created during respiration. For humans, the CO₂ concentration in exhaled air is close to constant, so by inhaling through the nose and exhaling through the mouth into a bag (and not consciously hyper- or hypoventilating), one can get a very good measurement of one's metabolism rate in different scenarios (and the lag is seconds, not hours for nutrition!). This is obviously way more difficult to do with a flying owl (even in a wind tunnel) but perhaps a surgically inserted airflow meter could work, or a closed-loop wind tunnel with very precise measurement of O₂/CO₂ levels. Yes, a flying owl has CO₂ emissions, and so does a running human, but way less than a combustion engine.

Another idea is to measure the carbon and water emitted as weight loss (yes, you lose weight by breathing) but there are other factors that could skew the results such as sweat evaporation, skin shedding etc.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 11 points 5 days ago

Just to add to your comment: calories in itself were a pretty good measurement for metabolic energy, because it is the energy needed to heat 1 gram of water by 1 °C, so something easily measurable to people at the time (roughly 100 years ago). The Joule was already proposed, but is less intuitive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 65 points 5 days ago (2 children)

An owl emitting 300 kilowatts of power would explode in a ball of flame that would light up the neighbourhood. I've never seen this happen, so I do have doubts about the numbers given here.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 18 points 5 days ago

They only do this as a last resort escape technique

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That just means migration is a lie because otherwise you would see explosions

*owlplosions it was right there yet you missed it :(

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Power is not a measure of work.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] nocklobster@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

My boss calls me a power bottom

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Can I have their number or something I dont know how to contact them

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Prager u science books for the Shitler youth be like…

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

nO, NO, I remember this from physics. Energy is only used to move things up and down. Side to side doesn't count. So as long as the owl stays at the same height on the tree it launched from, it can go as far as it needs to.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Assuming a spherical owl…

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

... On the ground. Flying spheres still require energy

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

NASA are so dumb for sending their satellites all the way into space. Why don't they simply float them above the trees as the wise and majestic owl teaches us?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They would hit the mountains at that height, and the FAA requires them to be up above airplane traffic anyways. After that, it gets crowded right above the launch pads, and sometimes there's shooting stars and stuff, so some satellites are forced to go even higher.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait, which mountains are between the us and Europe again?

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

It's either over the mountains, or your owl will have to thread the needle between the Azores and Greenland.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

Biggest owl weighs up to 10 lbs. (Blakiston’s Fish Owl)

300kW has dimension J/s and calorie has dimension J. It's like saying that you would walk 5km/h equivalent of over 200m.

I will not entertain the notion that they were sloppy with what units they used.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But they recharge on power lines, that's just science.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

They do not ... owls are solar powered, that's why they are nocturnal.... DUH.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why is the owl flying across the Atlantic?

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 3 points 4 days ago

Probably the only correct answer.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Why would the owls be migrating East/ West? So e they just go north/ south?

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I'll take a stab at it.

There are no known owl species that naturally grow up to 16 pounds. The rest of the numbers are just as meaningless.

If you wanted to check what it would take for a random owl species to migrate across the ocean from europe to north america, that's something we can kind of check.

After a bit of lookup, it seems that the burrowing owl needs about 50-75 calories a day at rest to live, flight multiplies those calories by a factor of roughly 9.2 times. (I'mma round up to 10 because fuck it.) So 500-750 a day of pure flight at a speed of somewhere between 2 and 33 mph. I'm going to settle at 20 because I like easy numbers and I feel like it's not too crazy fast. So 20 miles per hour across 24 hours gets us a distance of 480 miles. Iceland and Scotland are 500 miles away. Assuming any of these assumptions are at all fair, it seems like an owl hellbent on crossing the ocean could manage to do it with laser guidance in less than two days without access to ground based food.

[–] ethaver@kbin.earth 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah 16 pounds is a large cat like a Maine Coon cat or a small corgi / beagle. There are flighted birds that big but they're not common.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And it’s not even carrying a coconut

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

In Europe? The coconut's tropical!

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

All these people in the comments be acting like owls are real when you can easily see how fake the are when you buy them in Home Depot’s gardening department.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Now imagine that owl is carrying a coconut.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

African or European coconut?

[–] s@piefed.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Owls expel pellets. E = mc^2. By expelling pellets made of matter, owls gain energy that they then use in migratory flight.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

You can’t fact check something that doesn’t provide any of its work. Where did they get those numbers from? What equations did they use, and do they actually apply to this situation? Is the owl flying through a vacuum, through air, through honey? In reality, it would be flying through air, but we have no idea what the equation says it’s flying through, or even if it is flying. Maybe the equation is for cars traveling on a road.

Since it’s non-falsifiable, you can just disregard it. Claims require evidence, not assertions.

The problem is not just that the numbers are made up, they are in the wrong units. Watts is not a unit of energy.

It's like saying; a cow wants to eat an apple. Each apple weighs five liters. Therefore the cow would need a mouth 2 kg across. It would take the cow seven metres to eat the apple.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For starters, the average owl doesn't weigh 16 pounds, that's immediately proven false with a simple Google search. The smallest is an ounce, the largest just over 9 pounds.

On top of that, I can't find any species that migrates from Europe to America...

So false from the jump.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's a few hundred that migrate from eastern NA to Europe and Africa, but no owls. Owls don't really migrate at all. I did all the calculations in a different comment in this thread and the shitpost is so off it's incredibly easy to disprove.

https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/15688 https://datazone.birdlife.org/flyway/factsheet/east-atlantic

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I should have specified, any species of owl that migrates from Europe to America... Not sure what that image is on about. Everything seems wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bryndos@fedia.io 8 points 5 days ago

Most of them are stealthy enough to stowl away on a boat though.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The barn owl (the most common owl on the planet) weighs max 700g (listed on Table 1 here https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/brnowl/cur/appearance#meas but you need a subscription). So like 1.5 lbs.

Birds don’t really migrate east/west, and owls hardly migrate at all, and only a few species, not really barn owls. I’m not sure if there is an owl that migrates like that but even if it was true, tiny ruby throated hummingbirds migrate nonstop across the gulf. Weight doesn’t really matter.

Kilowatt is a rate of energy, not an amount. So let’s calculate that. And energy use in owls is documented on birds of the world as well. Flight speed is 80 km/h https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/brnowl/cur/behavior#locom

Energy use is 360.4 kJ/d, let’s triple that for continual flight across the ocean (idk I’m just making that up since this is all fake anyway), so 1081.2, we’ll round up to 1100.

Estimates of daily food consumption rates are limited. One captive female consumed a mean of 60.5 g/d over one year, amounting to 10.1% of her mass daily; consumption varied from 46.4 g/d in the warmest periods to 74.0 g/d in the coldest times (147). Two American Barn Owl consumed a mean of 74.1 g/d over a 10 d trial in August; it was estimated that energy use was 360.4 kJ/d (148). Other measures of daily food intake for wild American Barn Owl estimated from pellet contents range from 110 g/d in summer in Colorado (113) to a mean of 150 g/d over 1 yr in California (149). The mean gross energy intake for 4 (1 female, 3 males) sedentary American Barn Owl was 68.9 kcal/d; mean existence energy was 54.6 kcal/d, resulting in 79.3% efficiency in food utilization (150).

I just measured across from Massachusetts to Portugal, around 3000 mi or 4800 km. About 60 hours, so 1100 kJ/24h / 24/h x 60 h = 2750kJ = 657265.774 Calorie.

So yeah, very fake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ptolemai@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What's that in horsepower?

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

1 owlpower is roughly 0.37 horsepower

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[–] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

What if it takes a boat?

load more comments
view more: next ›