this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

Politics

923 readers
332 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The First Nation plans to formalize its partnership with the Fort Peck Sioux Tribes, in Montana, next week by signing a memorandum of understanding to advance the trade corridor and its infrastructure development.

The corridor intends to use traditional routes traversing Dakota territories in Saskatchewan, Alberta, Manitoba and into the United States, reviving the historic Oceti Sakowin trade network, a historic alliance of seven Dakota, Lakota and Nakota Indigenous groups united by kinship, language and spiritual beliefs. The shared trade routes historically facilitated economic and military ties across their territories. “We have a lot of history, and even to this day, ties linking us to our relatives,” said Rodger Redman, chief of the nation.

Redman said this corridor is not symbolic, but rather an economic engine for the countries. Standing Buffalo is located in a region rich with critical minerals vital to global industries including renewable energy and technology. By owning the corridor, Indigenous nations can control the movement of these resources and expand economic opportunities for their communities.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Horsecook@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

This is nuts.

The article focuses on the Canadian tribe, and how Canadian law doesn’t permit them to dodge Canadian taxes. The idea seems to be that American law might, so this could be a way to dodge Trump’s tariffs. But why would the Fort Peck Sioux expect Trump to honor a treaty that defeats his tariffs? The US doesn’t have a good track record on that to begin with, and Trump certainly wouldn’t give a shit. The Fort Peck Reservation doesn’t even border Canada directly. If this isn’t stopped at the Canada/US border, it’s because Trump is planning on sending in the US Army for an old-fashioned Indian massacre.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

This is another cash grab, just like oka.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Stay safe, that's all that I worry about.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think this administration would do to them? Deport the first people ala Trail of Tears 2? Or Small Pox Snuggies? Neither would surprise me at this point.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 3 points 17 hours ago

I think the key is to remember that anything you can think of, what they’ll actually do will somehow be worse.