this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

TankieJerk

113 readers
191 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide or atrocity denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. Please redirect any Fediverse tankie-posts to !MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.works to avoid bringing drama to Piefed.social

Curious about non-tankie leftism? If you've got a little patience for 19th century academic style, let a little Marx and Kropotkin be your primer!

Marx's Communist Manifesto, short and accessible! Highly recommended if you haven't read it

Kropotkin's Conquest Of Bread

Selected works of Marx

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something about the concept of Mao suffering and being afraid brings me great joy, but probably unrealistic even with the Japanese invasion.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mao actively avoided deploying his armies against the Japanese and allowed the Nationalists to soak up devastating losses of manpower and equipment (estimates of between 3-4 million dead and injured) and waited until the supposed United front collapsed before mobilising against the weakened chiang kai-shek once western support evaporated.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, hard to fault the strategic sense of that, especially given that Chiang Kai-Shek wasn't much more than a fascist himself ruining the dream of Sun Yat-sen

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

Strategically Mao was amazing.

As a human being Mao was living fucking compost.