this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
25 points (93.1% liked)

Piracy

22339 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/piracy

No netflix or streaming services landlubbers allowed, this is pirates territory.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was just browsing some torrents lately and anything that isn't on a torrent is on a website like rapidgator. Rapidgator is ok if you downloading audiobooks, but why aren't more people using OnionShare to send and receive files? I haven't used it and I don't know it's limitations, but if I ever wanted a file which was shared over it, I would spring into action and install it.

So yeah, why?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TGhost@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I already tested it,
It was good enough,

For me, I don't want to use their resources, because this service has an cost, and its better used by journalists, activists etc, rather me to download shitty Hollywood movies.

Speaking just for me ofc. No judging

[–] dinosaurdynasty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tbf Tor needs benign traffic for the important stuff to hide in.

[–] TGhost@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

yeah true,

But in warez's context, if you host your tor's relay, and you pay for the bandwith, then an mass sharing have a cost. And you have to include the storage too, its not free.

Thats why my answer,
for me onionshare != rapidshare.

Not the same "business model" at all,

[–] Anonymous_TorPerson@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ohh... I think that's fair. It might put on a lot of strain on the system. But yeah, I wonder if it is capable of taking it?

[–] TGhost@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it can take the load, but not in an warez context.
Where u share the last wanted big AAA games on an forum, depend the storage and servers behind.

I would no test it ^^ I guess it can be like an DOS for them.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something like this would seem to make more sense to run over I2P I'd think. But it looks like the devs aren't interested in trying to go that route

https://github.com/onionshare/onionshare/issues/377

Maybe in the future someone will fork the project to work over I2P eventually.

[–] candle_lighter@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Might not be needed as much for some people either since i2p supports torrents. Once Qbittorrent supports i2p I'd imagine it will take off a bit more especially if they integrate an i2p router into the client.

[–] chevy9294@monero.town 6 points 2 years ago

Probably because of speed. Torrenting over VPN is a lot faster than sharing over Tor.