this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3195 readers
446 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Highly doubtful about their "reluctance"....

[–] ahornsirup@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

No reason to be. All that age verification requirements do is create extra cost for them. They've got the data already (or at least a close enough estimate) just not in a way that satisfies this idiotic law.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course they're reluctant. All these laws do are add costs and hassle. The additional lawyer fees alone must be astronomical.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah but theses regulatory burdens can only be born by mega-corporations so even though it is extra work for them, it still benefits them.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They were both at the inauguration, shoulder to shoulder at the coronation.

They signed on the dotted.