this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
234 points (96.8% liked)

Games

39876 readers
1020 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 73 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh boy, can't wait for more average but poorly managed games!

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (25 children)

Don't forget console exclusive.

[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Or just windows store exclusives..

I'll eat my fine leather hat before I use that dog shit store again.

Keep in mind that that's extra special because I don't own a fine leather hat, so I gotta buy one first.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

This is the real hell

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] jerome@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Laws against monopolies don't exist, anymore, eh?

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

After this deal MS will STILL be in third place.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

3rd place in... What? I'm trying to search around to see what you're referring to here, but I can't find anything.

By total market cap, Microsoft already blows these companies out of the water. By just videogame divisions, Sony and Nintendo are way farther ahead because of hardware sales, but that doesn't really make sense to include in the conversation about acquiring a publisher. I can't find any solid numbers either way isolating publishing, other than that the top 5 in recent years seems to be Tencent, Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, and Activision/Blizzard (with EA hanging around too). Seems like any of those two merging is going to be bad for everyone other than shareholders.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toastus@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Usually I am against huge mergers like this because they rarely benefit the customer, but ActiBlizzard was about as bad as it gets anyway.

Selfishly I hope maybe at least one decent RTS might come from this before everything gets enshittyfied again.
I realize though that OG Warcraft/Starcraft were not the big motivators for MS so the chance is probably slim.

[–] Damdy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should look into Stormgate.

It's an upcoming rts from frost giant studios which consists of some of the original blizzard team responsible for StarCraft.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I actually got a spot in the closed alpha this month.

It feels pretty good so far even though unfortunately I can't play as much as I would like due to my job and aspects of my personal life taking a lot of time right now.
I plan on getting at least a couple more games in this weekend.

[–] Damdy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's cool. I was never very good myself but I'd like to play around in the noobs ranks. I just hope there's a good story mode.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Microsoft still supports AoE2, and that game is going on 22+ years. Some of the other stuff they've released has been a bit hit and miss, but they at least tried to do something fresh.

I'll take that over ActiBlizz dropping support for the SC2 pro scene for no good reason other than "profitability" any day.

Hell, maybe they can fix WoW classic while they're at it, and say what you will about the guy but if I understand correctly even Chris Metzen is coming back.

[–] gataloca@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Out of all these studios I suppose I like Microsoft's games the most, but I still think it's bad that the regulators didn't shoot down this merger from the view of competitiveness.

I don't think the gaming market is healthy when only a handful of corporations like Microsoft, Ubisoft, EA Games and SquareEnix hold what I assume to be 75% of the gaming AAA market. It restricts creativity and stifles competition and the ones paying the price are going to be us consumers.

Even worse if they go and start vendor locking games to Windows, which sucks for us Linux gamers or Xbox which sucks for Playstation gamers.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How many new AAA studios could be created from scratch with this money?

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not too mention losing all the devs who'll probably leave due to the merge anyway.

[–] timception@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I didn’t even get D4 yet (but planned to) and all my friends have stopped playing it already ☠️ I don’t think they have anything else up their sleeve at this point. Seems they haven’t made anything new since warcraft.

[–] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They are still pumping money like crazy though.

[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

D4 was dead the moment they announced D2R. Why would I pay $80 for a game with microtransactions and battlepass when I can pay $50 for a game that comes complete in box?

They should have taken D2R kept the mechanics and just rolled new classes, maps, and items.

I don't want a new game, I just want more content.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Overwatch was amazing under Jeff.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You say this, but Jeff was there when they started OW2. He was the one who even announced it and their plan to forcibly replace Overwatch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timception@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oof sorry I forgot about that one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I mean for gamers in general. This merger will not benefit consumers.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Activision Blizzard was already about as anti-consumer as possible, so in this particular case at worst nothing will change, at best Microsoft might actually clean house and there might be some improvements for the consumers...

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I genuinely love your optimism.

Microsoft will use this purchase to further restrict releases to non Xbox consoles, no matter when they agree to to industry bodies. It is in Microsofts interest to only release on their platforms as releasing to PS or Switch will cost them in Xbox purchases.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, sorry, I was thinking from a PC standpoint and sort of ignored the whole console perspective (though, frankly, the console market seems to have been absolutely fubared from its inception, from a consumer standpoint, so anything Microsoft does will probably be as relevant as farting into an ocean of shit...)

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but game production isn't about the consumers. It's a business.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They've been dead since Activision merged with them.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

That merger reminds me of this sketch: Halo: The Future of Gaming https://piped.video/JFtoanBDjOE

load more comments
view more: next ›