this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
297 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

76432 readers
2996 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Hey y'all. Reminder not to trust a platform owned and operated by a Nazi manchild.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 days ago

Shouldn't trust it yet.

Or ever.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago

XChat, has some red flags.

With a white circle and a swastika inside?

[–] Netrunner@programming.dev 17 points 6 days ago

Brain damaged people trust x again.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago

probably??? try definitely and ever

[–] notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If you trust ANYTHING Musk has for you well then have I got a bridge to sell you.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

"xchat" sounds like one of those porn chat rooms

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Yet? More like never.

"The guy who helped install Donald Trump, did a Nazi Salute at Trump's victory parade on live TV, supports authoritarians, and who has declared war on transgender people to the point you're not allowed to say "Cis" or "Cisgender" on his platform, has created an end to end encrypted chat."

All of this has the same vibes as the time Brigham Young University amended their code of conduct to allow people to come out as queer, let some students come out, and then changed the CoC back and expelled the students.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

~~shouldn't trust it yet~~ shouldn't trust it ever

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't trust anything coming out of Elon's fascisthole. Deleted the app when he bought it and never looked back.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I refuse to even click on links. If a friend sends me an X link to something funny/interesting I tell them "I don't click on Nazi links" and ask them to find me another source.

[–] edgarzen@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Signal and encrypted email only.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Friends and I swapped our group chat to Signal the day Trump was inaugurated...the first time.

If things keep going the way they are, no one should be communicating on anything but encrypted messaging apps.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Probably shouldn't? How 'bout definitely shouldn't, ditto for Twitter in general. Give ATproto shit all you want but at least you can move to an independent PDS with it.

Granted ActivityPub is still ideal over ATproto, but both are better than a centralized black box.

[–] Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

I hope Elon musk gets cancelled(cancer) for this useless nonsensical black box

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It’s like a regular encrypted chat but with peepholes and racism.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

Ah, new ways for Kegsbreath to expose his idiocy.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

LOL nope. I'd use anything else. As in NO X.

It was eyerolling back when that dickhead decided to sell blue checkmarks instead of issuing them only to verified celebrities.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I trust it but there is a major misunderstanding of end to end encryption. Some implementations the platform holder does not have a key to decrypt data but it is far from a requirement. All end to end means is there's a blocker preventing the network from seeing what you send not twitter who im assuming has a copy of the key.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is NOT end to end encryption. That is transport layer encryption. So basically SSL

End to end is from sender to recipient. No one in the middle should be able to read anything

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's like ssl but done at the application layer. Nobody in the middle can read it except it's nobody in the middle of you and twitter and twitter and the recipient. If you put something on a platform and they have the key they will always be able to read it if they want to.

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

are you being dense on purpose? sender and recipient are both users. never twitter.

i'm not saying that twitter's messaging is secure. the opposite. what i'm saying is that you statement of "All end to end means is there’s a blocker preventing the network from seeing what you send not twitter" is 100% objectively wrong.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 125 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (22 children)

TL;dr of the article :

  1. They keep your private key on their servers.
  2. Their implementation allows for AITM attacks.
  3. It's closed source.
  4. There's no perfect forward secrecy.

This secret stays between you, me, and Elon.

I hope politicians use the hell out of it, so we can see what they really think when it gets (inevitably) hacked in a few weeks.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

is it different with signal, telegram, whatsapp?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

If you chat on Xitter you‘re chatting with mecha Hitler.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 97 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

offering me end-to-end encrypted chat

No one - not even X - can access or read your messages

This key is then stored on X’s servers

So...they're just blatantly lying?

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's encrypted with a 4 digit pin so they'll have to spend at least 316.8809e-10 years on brute-forcing it.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's why my PIN is 5 digits: 12345

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

One. Two. Three. Four. Five?

That's amazing. I've got the same combination on my luggage.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...yet? How bout just not trusting it at all?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›