this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
488 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It depends on how far away you sit. But streaming has taken over everything and even a little compression ruins the perceived image quality of a higher-DPI display.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

I watch 576i DVDs on a 24" 1366x768 TV and I don't mind because I sit reasonably far.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Me getting 480p videos for my video projector : "Oh... no really?" ¯\(ツ)

PS: FWIW I do have a Vision Pro (for work, I didn't pay for it personally) so I technically could enjoy high res content... but honestly I can't bother using this to watch videos. I'm fine with just my desktop screen or video projector. I just don't get the high res.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But they are much better for energy companies

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is pretty obvious due to how they had to add HDR at the same time to sell it. The HDR was a real progression, but they wouldn’t get to sell you higher res Blu-ray formats and streaming packages with just that.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's why I have a 65" and sit barely 2m from it. Stick on a 4k Dolby Vision encoded file through Jellyfin. Looks fucking great!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Black and white antennae TV's from the 1950's was clearer than a lot of TV's today, but they weighed 600 kilograms. Nowadays I buy cheap, small TV's and let my brain fill in the empty spaces like it's supposed to. /s

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Study Boldly Claims 4K And 8K TVs Aren't Much Better Than HD To Your Eyes, But Is It True?

The rare exception to Betteridge's Law.

But yeah, this matches my experience. I can tell the difference between 1080 and 4k from my couch if I work at it, but not enough to impact my enjoyment of what I'm watching, and definitely not as much as the difference HDR makes.

Even at computer monitor distance, running a 4k monitor at 1440 with high pixel density is probably going to be a better experience than wrenching every single pixel you can get out of it. Framerate is better than resolution for gaming, for the most part.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›