this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3189 readers
195 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iii@mander.xyz 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Meaning they still don't understand that it's morally disgusting to scan everyone's private communications. They're just annoyed that people care.

Their proposal should be explicitly outlawed, privacy should be a human right.

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it happens surprisingly often.

Even for people that aren't too knowledgeble or care about it, it's usually a good indicator if it's a "bad thing" when the ministers themselves are exempt from what is being proposed.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

"Rules for thee but not for me" specifically needs to be outlawed. Anything the ruling class wants to impose on the people gets the same rules applied to them.

But we all know that never happens.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

Right, until next time they propose it again.

[–] casmael@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

These guys should uhh take a long skiing trip to Norway, right guys?