this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
63 points (97.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35414 readers
1323 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can argue the uselessness of most American gun laws. I should note, a great many of the arguments rely on the fact of the 2nd Amendment and our court's historical interpretation of it.

Almost every law I see proposed either runs afoul of the 2nd, is useless, and worse, many are counterproductive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do mean, "what controversial topic would I be correct about", or do you mean, "what can i make the other person shut up about"? Because those are different skills, and it's the reason why politicians win over the public and scientists get derided.

[–] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 7 points 3 days ago

I had intended the former, so I'm regretting my choice of verbiage now. Oops.

[–] ori@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago

Why privacy is important

The fact that police can lie to your face in order to trick you into saying something they can label as “incriminating” leads to society having no trust for the police.

[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Assuming people are actually able and willing to recognize when they start hiding in circular reasoning (or other logical fallacies but by experience, begging the question is most common):

Argument about matter being the foundation of reality. It's not. And I'd start by questioning your understanding of the word "matter".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I have opinions but I'm not confident to argue about them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'm a woman who has slurs about her. Depending on who I'm arguing and what winning means I can't win an argument about whether it's raining as we slowly get drenched.

That said in a constructive discussion I'm really good at convincing people that comprehensive public transit is valuable, that public services are important, and that a general sense of cooperation is invaluable for society.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

By the amount of times I had moderators act bratty to me for: proving the Roman Catholic Church had control of our world since 538 AD or earlier.

[–] salacious_coaster 4 points 3 days ago

Nothing. I've spent my life arguing and several years arguing professionally. There are not many bigger wastes of time. I still do it, just to speak my peace, not because I'm hoping to change a bunch of minds.

[–] Icytrees@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I convinced three crown attorneys that Macron did Notré Dame. That says a lot about the Canadian justice system, I just don't know what.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›