this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
66 points (94.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

13718 readers
190 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That means at least half the people who live in those properties won't be able to own a motor car and I think it's a basic thing that people expect particularly living in town.

Emphasis added.

Absolute carbrain. What the fuck is the matter with people.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

@CompactFlax @grue it's a tax haven. Where else are they supposed to keep their Bentleys

[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But why only one spot per household? Where are the two other cars going to be parked?

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 1 points 3 days ago
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is incredibly stupid. It will drive up the cost for housing

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is incredibly stupid. It will drive up the cost for housing

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Well, I was going to joke about “a chicken in every pot, a parking spot for every home”

But it turns out that that is basically what the original slogan was about completed with “…and a car in every backyard, to boot.“ Conflating progress and prosperity with car-centrism and businesss interests… turns out it’s been there the whole time.

[–] mjr 12 points 3 days ago

Has nobody shown the government of Jersey any Strong Towns or City Beautiful videos explaining the damage done by parking minimums?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

The title came pre-editorialized by OP of the thread I cross-posted from, LOL. I love to see folks outside of urbanist spaces starting to get it.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And in the news at 10: British bean-looking fellow is wrong about things.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

First time I've seen genuine Jersey gammon.

[–] mjr 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is Jersey British? I suspect it's controversial.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

It's something the Normans hung onto when they took over Britain.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

Fair point actually, I haven't read about it until now. For others interested https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

The Channel Islands are a truly strange backwater.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

What the fuck.