this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
98 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

76918 readers
3243 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IllNess 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is sickening. Restricting access should be done at the ISP level and should be opt-in for those with kids. A password can be set by the parent.

We all really know this is about control.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Not at the ISP level, at the DNS/hosts file level.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Please verify your age"

Please fuck off.

But I need to keep track of you so I can better control you!

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The headline is vert clickbaity : it does not affect VPN users (the law forbids age-gated websites from promoting VPNs as a circumvention), and the whole article is just an ad for VPNs

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn’t read the article, as you said it’s just an ad for VPNs. But one way this affects VPN users is that now you can’t VPN into Italy to use a service without hitting the age verification prompt. That just sucks!

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 4 points 1 week ago

This would have been a (if not the only) good point to make in the article considering the title. But I guess this would have taken space away from ads

[–] snipingsnipe@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Tbh I would generally welcome a VPN-industrial-complex as long as it doesn't result in a small ring of big names lobbying for systematic monopolistic dominance as to crush anything that doesn't require PII... but I'm sure commercial and state interests would converge :/

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Vote stupid far rights, get stupid far eight policies.