Nvidia please make a dedicated driver team for Linux. IIRC one of the biggest stumbling block for a general SteamOS release is subpar Nvidia performance on DX12 games that can get around 30% performance degradation. Even Valve assigned a team of engineers to work on this specifically.
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
667 points (99.3% liked)
Linux Gaming
22166 readers
390 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
WWW:
- Linux Gaming wiki
- Gaming on Linux
- ProtonDB
- Lutris
- PCGamingWiki
- LibreGameWiki
- Boiling Steam
- Phoronix
- Linux VR Adventures
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There is a fix coming for the Nvidia performance problem. It's going to take some months for all the pieces to fall in place. See this video for more about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpXINAMaljA
Nvidia's shit Linux support is why I've been stuck with Windows despite how badly I want to switch to Arch. You get no Nvidia Control Panel, no Nvidia App, no ShadowPlay, no RTX HDR, no 3D Settings panel; basically the only thing you can do with an Nvidia GPU on Linux is render 3D graphics. Which is fine if all you do with your PC is CAD or non-competitive SDR gaming. But I paid for all these extra features and so I'd like to use them.
Can't even switch to an AMD GPU, either, because I like Ray Tracing too much, so I'm stuck waiting on Nvidia to get their shit together (or AMD to finally release a GPU that can handle RT @ 4K120) before I can finally ditch Microsoft for good.
Obvious solution: Build a D3D12 to D3D11 translation layer, kinda like DXVK but in reverse
I hate Microsoft shoving AI down our throats. I will not upgrade to AI Windows. I just don't want to port over to a new OS because: (1) I like 10's GUI, (2) I don't trust an OS that I might not be able to run word or excel on because I do so much on them, and (3) my version of Windows doesn't have ads on it.
There are alternatives to Microsoft Office like LibreOffice and OnlyOffice. Plus you can still use Office 365 in a browser if it "has" to be Microsoft Office.
LibreOffice has been so good. As a non-power user I haven't even noticed a difference, aside from the lack of bullshit.
I've used both Libreoffice and Onlyoffice along with Microsofts offerings. I've gone several hours in onlyoffice to only notice when I'm saving that I was using Onlyoffice instead of Microsoft Excel. That's how similar they look.
load more comments
(1 replies)
my version of Windows doesn’t have ads on it.
Windows 7?
As others have mentioned - and to add my own opinion: In terms of Writer (Word) and Calc (Excel), LibreOffice is by far better than M$ for everyone who isn't for some reason an absolute fan of searching for buttons that have the function they need by looking at tiny icons.
Cool, me to.
Do it goddammit!
view more: next ›