Sunflier

If someone bought a cyber-truck without the Grock, they bought it as it was. Shoving Grock down the consumers' throats without their consent would constitute a material alteration of tge car that was originally bought. This would then constitute graffiti.

Edit: if the vehicle had not been fully purchased and paid, this would be potential grounds for a refund because the material alteration of the good would make the contract for the sale of the vehicle voidable.

Some may be undecided. Some may have not responded, which can put them in the undecided category. So, that can account for a chunk of that. Some may be willing to overlook the bad stuff because the good stuff outweighs that (might be a rich black guy, or they hate they gays so much that they're willing to overlook the bad stuff). But, that tends to be a minority.

Probably the actual Nazis like Steve Bannon, Anne Coulter, or Laura Ingram.

They're all a bunch of f-----, that want to walk around, come on our streets, and demand our children. And we should look them in the eye and say, 'No, you're not going to have our children!'

Statistically, a child is at greater risk of being sexually abused by a preacher than a member of the LGBT community

I'd draw it 413524, but I'd read it as 135241.

They already are

I would contend that the rich have access to more resources precisely because the poor have little to no access to resources

That makes sense in the old market before the assembly line (and now AI), but it doesn't make sense in the post-scarcity world we live in today.

If the poor were to have access to more resources, it would then be because the rich have less access than they did prior.

Not necessarily. The poor having access to resources would actually increase the wealth at the top because then there would be more customers that can pay their bills.

because that wealth is directly the same wealth . . . that the poor do not have.

Sort of. Some resources are scarce (take uranium as an example in a situation where people bid on uranium to build a nuclear plan). However, some are not (like medicine and health insurance or housing (we can easily build more condos) or transportation (we could build metros for transit to work, but we can't have that because the car industry bought our politicians)).

*Edit: Here's a simplified way to think of it. Pushing down on the ceiling of the house could potentially cause it to sink into the mud. However, if we raise the foundation by putting it on stilts, it would raise up the ceiling (we even have skyscrapers in cities).

Its not a measure of the level of acceptable inequality by measuring how excessive the top is. The measurement of intolerability is how we treat billionaires at the expense how we treat those on the floor. It's that we have billionaires AND homeless. It's that we have billionaires who control Congress for profit at the expense of universal health insurance when all other developed nations have it.

I think its more a "we shouldn't have billionaires right now" rather than a blanket prevention of billionaires. They are being a cancer on our politics in the bribery scheme we have from Citizens United in that they are paying politicians to prevent the American people from getting their basic needs met. The existence of billionaires isn't inherently wrong. Hell, if we ever figure out asteroid mining, there'd be quadrillionaires. But, its the psychotic system we have of having billionaires is by them bribe the politicians to deny the people their basic needs. At this point, such behavior is parasitic.

Wait wait wait! Lemme get on to the other side of the line so I can live in a blue state. Just 3 more months!

It's not that we shouldn't have billionaires. Its that we have billionaires when we have people living on the streets because the rent is so ridiculous. Its that we have people dying on the streets because they cannot afford health insurance. The gravy on the shit-fest is that billionaires are actively bribing the politicians to prevent those policies from being implemented. That is the textbook recipe for guillotines.

Very much so.