this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
773 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26409 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago

Megyn Kelly is a pedophile and her teen daughter ain't safe with her

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Fuuuuuuuuuck

"This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls," she continued. "I'm just giving you facts that he wasn't into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby."

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

15 still isn't legal though.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plus, she's saying epstein went as young as he could get away with. That he liked the 13 year olds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

barely legal

15

Someone explain to this bitch what "barely" means.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

REPUBLICANS LOVE CHILD RAPE

simple as that.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In the next episode she will argue that domestic volence against women is a love language

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

"Is it really a crime if you're damaging your own property?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It should be also pointed out that he's totally innocent of elder abuse, due to the age of the victims. Why are people refusing to see the bright side of this? There are scores of crimes he's innocent of!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"Raping 12 year olds is OK"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zigglesbarlow@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I got banned from reddit for commenting "woodchipper" on this article next to posts openly supporting violence against young girls. Pretty cool platform to be thrown out of.

[–] bss03 12 points 6 days ago

Hebephilia vs. pedophilia? That's a defense I've seen before. Didn't work for creepy Internet boyz. Let's see if it works for the Republican party.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

Raping teens instead of kids is just as heinous.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

"This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls,

That's not 'barely legal'....

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Fox "News" simping for pedos, what else is new?

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did she get raped or molested as a child

nah, but she's pro raping children

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 14 points 6 days ago

The child bride party strikes again

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›