this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26420 readers
2636 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The plan from the Interior Department is one of the president’s most significant steps yet to increase domestic fossil fuel production.

I will note that the US is a net oil exporter, so this is all for overseas consumption.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As long there isn't one of those fucking wind farms out there wrecking the environment and giving whales autism, right?

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, wouldn't a wind farm be "drilling" the air for energy?

Hmmmmm...

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fan is to turbine as drill is to... turbine?

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

Well.. it's blade/bit moving in a rotational direction that is designed to access an energy source.

Come on work with me on this..

LOL!

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, please, oh please.. let there be a HUGE oil field RIGHT off the coast of where Mar-a-lago is.

I just think that would be delicious.

[–] DahGangalang 1 points 11 hours ago

Can't decide how I'd feel about this.

On one hand, they'd probably ruin the scenic ocean views from Mar-a-lago. On the other, the owners would probably make a tom (more) money off it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

THIS IS ALL FOR OVERSEAS CONSUMPTION

Poison us, rake in the money. Questions? Go fuck yourself. The republiQan way.