this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
351 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35661 readers
3669 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 49 minutes ago

Lol, pedo-prez supporters have been working overtime to protect their pedo-leader. No surprise that this old libertarian "I'm not really a pedophile even though I want to rape minors" chestnut came back.

Gonna have to change the meaning of POTUS, given the head of our country is now the Pedophile of the United States

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

My take on this is that pedophilia encompasses sex with minors a whole, and then you have your subtypes.

Don't really care if this is technically accurate or not. It dodges the semantic bullshit pedophiles use.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 20 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

See, the distinction between a pedophile, hebephile and ephebophile exists for a good reason.

But the thing is, the moment you start getting into those differences, it immediately makes you sound like a pedophile.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Only because online people are dumb as fuck. They cant process the nuance of basic arguments. They just want simple clickable buzzwords to like, share and subscribe. This is why we now have some of the dumbest cunts in the world claiming that 25 year old "children" cant consent....

Rape of woman, rape of a teenager, rape of a child, rape of a baby. To put these under one umbrella term is fucking weird. Its like saying "Americans voted for Trump". Its true, but its not accurate. And Im pretty fucking sure theres a lot of Americans would take issue with that statement.

Everyone just needs to take a page out of the UK play book, and call him a fucking nonce!

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago

One of the many reasons it's impossible to have an honest and mature discussion on the topic. No one cares to actually be accurate with terminology just because it's "icky"

Now if only we could also get research funding on the topic that doesn't have a billion strings attached to the researchers or the results being locked away forever because no one wants their name attached.

Or the best one peer review being basically impossible on the topic.

It's such a huge problem.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I would just call him a child rapist. IMO that actually sounds worse than "pedophile" because you could apply the latter to someone who was attracted to minors but didn't rape any.

Regardless of his attraction, he raped children, so he's a child rapist.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

pedophile, hebephile and ephebophile, are after all just terms for someone with a sexual attraction disability. Typically due to a hormonal issue, trauma or mental disability.

A child rapist is someone who fucks minors and should be locked up for life if not put down. With a list of exceptions that a reasonable person can count on one hand.

While no one reasonable goanna call two high school seniors fucking when ones 17 and the other is two months older at 18. A child rapist.

A fat old fuck doing it sure the fuck is.

We should really start calling things by what they are and not misusing terminology. Makes it less impactful.

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Add to that, that to the best of my knowledge, most child rapists are not pedophiles and most pedophiles are not child rapists.

The two being convoluted helps child rapists by letting them hide behind their sexual orientation ("he can't be a child predator, he has a wife and kids!") and hurts pedophiles by stigmatizing their condition so that they have a harder time getting help to control or remove their sexual urges.

If we really want to reduce the amount suffering for both adults and, most importantly, children then we have to be able to start having actual conversations about this.

[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

keeping it very old school, i see. i like it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 50 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

This distinction only means something for psychology.

And I get that the vast majority of child rapes happen because children are more vulnerable HOWEVER at some point you can just afford an adult prostitute 1000 times over if you actually want that. It's clear that these people actually wanted to rape children. So the pedophile label makes sense.

[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly. Splitting hairs and calling it an obscure word that is only ever used in a clinical setting weakens and cheapens it. just call them pedophies. don't let them redefine or spin it. just pedophile.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Or just be accurate and call them a rapist. A child rapist.

Pedophile already is a weakened word. Both cause it gets over used, and because it does have an actual accurate use case that doesn't accurately describe what's happened.

Accurate terminology is always more powerful.

[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That works as well!

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

If you were 18, and got caught having sex with your 17 year old girl/boy friend. Would you be happy to be placed into the same category of horrible human beings as Ian Watkins...?

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What was the word he was about to say?

[–] mechaboss@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't understand how they can even defend it. Best case scenario they are saying that raping women is perfectly fine as long as they're old enough. I get that with some of the extreme MAGA out there really do believe this kinda shit, but I'm sure bullshit like this is why we see more and more people leaving MAGA every day. It's no surprise that Republicans are getting absolutely destroyed in almost every election lately when you see what they act like and I feel like that will be their eventual downfall. They see these echo chambers online and believe that is an actual representation of what all republican voters think. A lot of people seem to forget, but most people still sit somewhere in the middle especially outside the internet. There's still an argument to be had about how ignorant people were when it came to the election last year, but bitching about what already happened is never going to get us moving forward.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And trafficking! Trump’s base was on a mission to root out pedos AND sex traffickers. This is at the core of the awful things Epstein was found guilty of. Take away the pedophilia and you still have monstrous behavior that should be dealt with harshly.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

The pizzagate projection

[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The right wing party, to an astonishing degree, cozies up with and funds literal extremist organizations en masse. the left went for more social and peaceful methods, while the right wing only ramped up the mayhem. that's one of the reasons that since the late 70's there has been absolutely no element of left wing organized terror (only a few lone wolf attacks and ecoterrorism), while there is always, at any given point in time, a number of organized, well equipped extremist organizations on the right engaging in all types of activities..... political violence, stochastic terrorism, radical violence, misogynstic violence, massive amounts of disinfo, and countless other activities.

No, not all individuals who are conservative subscribe to or even know about this. But the party itself is absolute cancer of the worst degree possible. they are not nearly as benign and harmless as you think. .