this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
675 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26454 readers
2580 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Government brain drain will haunt US after DOGE abruptly terminated.

After Donald Trump curiously started referring to the Department of Government Efficiency exclusively in the past tense, an official finally confirmed Sunday that DOGE “doesn’t exist.”

Talking to Reuters, Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Scott Kupor confirmed that DOGE—a government agency notoriously created by Elon Musk to rapidly and dramatically slash government agencies—was terminated more than eight months early. This may have come as a surprise to whoever runs the DOGE account on X, which continued posting up until two days before the Reuters report was published.

As Kupor explained, a “centralized agency” was no longer necessary, since OPM had “taken over many of DOGE’s functions” after Musk left the agency last May. Around that time, DOGE staffers were embedded at various agencies, where they could ostensibly better coordinate with leadership on proposed cuts to staffing and funding.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 3 points 15 minutes ago

Doge was a grift, nothin more. It's always a fucking grift with those "people".

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

One of many troubling issues with all this and the way it was handled is that these cuts were made too hastily. My former employer is a federal contractor whose income was some mix of federal, state, and private. Had there been sufficient time to reallocate staff and resources towards state and ~~federal~~ private funding, they/we would have had time to change our strategy and pursue those other lines of funding -- likely avoiding the massive monthly layoffs that have been going on in 2025. But that takes time, which was not something anybody had with the sudden, drastic, and unprecedented cancellation of federal contracts that did not leave any room for a smooth transition It was just lost jobs and shattered lives with little to no benefit for working class people.

It may just be my circle, but my friends and colleagues who managed to keep their jobs pretty much all complain about how they're dealing with burnout now because they have an untenable workload but also the work environment is so stressful because everybody's still under threat of more layoffs. This is happening both in federal work as well as private industry.

They wanted people to feel that way. They explicitly stated they wanted people to feel defeated.

“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” he said. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can't do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so.

“We want to put them in trauma.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/video-donald-trump-russ-vought-center-renewing-america-maga

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

The one valuable thing DOGE showed is is what happens when you put a 19 year old broccoli-haired dog shit person in governance.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago

This is what happens when someone has a whole shitload of money but not a good understanding of the world in which he can spend it.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Efficiency-obsessed weirdos don't understand redundancies. All they see are inefficiencies, and think people can just make up for them in harder times by just "working harder", which for these weirdos just become a new baseline for even more cuts.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

For a man who is obsessed with space travel and claims we need to go live on Mars. He doesn't understand how much redundancy is critical to survival in space.

Imagine a sci-fi spaceship... you are light-years away from civilization and any repairs. What if something goes wrong on your ship? Well? There had better be at least a half dozen back up systems to guarantee that you will survive instead of being fucked.

You cannot apply just-in-time supply chain logic to space travel. YOU WILL DIE!

No wonder SpaceX hasn't been able to get out of low-earth orbit.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

His only obsession is social acceptance and adoration, he doesn't even want to go to Mars for whatever good it will do, he wants to go live somewhere where he's the defacto "owner" of the whole goddamn planet. So people will be trapped working for him. And so that everyone else thinks he's soooo cool for doing a space travel.

He isn't going to Mars at least. I was worried for a while he might pull it off, but I'd be shocked if it happens before he overdoses or dies of pathological levels of cringe and ignorance.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

You give him too much credit for seeing inefficiency. It was simply “gov is too expensive. We need massive layoffs”.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

don't understand redundancies

names agency after a program where every user has to download everyone else's transactions

[–] Quexotic 2 points 2 hours ago

I'd be shocked if he knew how the blockchain works.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 5 points 8 hours ago

@ZILtoid1991 @MicroWave the Tories did that to the NHS here and then we had a pandemic.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Musk left in May.... wow it's been a long than 1 years.

[–] acme401@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Musk is a Nazi & should be deported.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 4 hours ago

Preferably, in a Amazon box. Pine is too good for this bastard.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago

Fuck deporting him, get him while he's still in Ameirca

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 53 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Duh it was nothing but a cover for the grift of billions of dollars.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 hours ago

And covering for electronic election tampering.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

A grift of access to confidential government data. Data is the new gold.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 59 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I've seen it first hand. I work as a consultant in public sector. Every where we go now the teams are crippled because people took the buyouts and left. Network teams that were 7 people reduced to 2 that are barely keeping things together. I'm sure NetApp, IBM, Microsoft, etc... love selling all these consulting hours now.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

I was at a military industry conference a month or so ago, with several flag level officers giving talks. The total amount of lost years of experience and senior leadership in the military and intelligence agencies is staggering. It is going to take generations to recover.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'd bet some of those ex government employees are back doing the same job as IBM contractors for 3x the cost.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

Yep, exactly. That's DOGE efficiency.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 254 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Many Americans may not realize this, but the actions of DOGE were effectively the destruction of their generational inheritance; decades and generations of taxpayer dollars to build an effective machine for doing the work of government.

That won't be rebuilt in a month or a year or even a decade. Its multi-generational damage which has been done.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It is part of why I want the Blue States to break off from the Confederates and build a fresh government. If you are going to replace what was broken, it should be only for people who appreciates what was lost. The MAGA are just going to bring out the chainsaw again...

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That's the conclusion I came to after they decided SNAP was expendable too. The federal government is good for literally nothing. We've already been conquered by Russia and this is what it looks like.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

And as citizens attempt to rebuild, the data taken will be weaponised and used against them.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 121 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

But just think of all the data that Elon Musk got to mine out of the government, to feed to his AI.

Won't anyone think of the billionaires?

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. Data on how the gov't works. What it does and how it did it.

After he went ahead and changed the way they do it. All in all, quite useless information now.

The only thing Grok will learn is how to impersonate the government better.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Plus personal data on all employees and quite likely personal data on all citizens

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 23 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, maybe they shut it down once they got all the data out of it they wanted.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 79 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The only way to recoup losses from the damage done will be an effective 99%+ tax on income, from any source, on amounts over 10 million.

That and treason charges, followed by executions

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago

I mean I'm all for the guillotines coming out. I think we should have brought them out on January 7th 2021 and start taking serious making things right then.

But even a modest wealth tax (like every red cent after a billion becomes the states or off with your head).

Like no amount of money can mend a broken heart? What was destroyed isn't something you can just throw money at to fix. There was a breach of trust between the smartest people in our society (NASA, NIH, etc..) and society itself, in the sense that the elected government is a reflection of society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It'll be a good day when seal team six is bin laden-ing this mangled cock ass hat.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Here you forgot some of these: - -

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 16 hours ago

the stupid thing is, dumpy mcshitpants has increased the national debt by $2T in less than a year. they haven't saved shit.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 58 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

DOGE saw a 250lb body builder and said "Lose some weight, fatso!"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] human@slrpnk.net 50 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

By June, Congress was drawn, largely down party lines, on whether to codify the “DOGE process”—rapidly firing employees, then quickly hiring back whoever was needed

To consider this as an intentional "process" a person has to have zero empathy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

DOGE couldn't have possibly worked, ever. I think everybody knows a situation where there's an employee who is contributing far more than their own manager knows. So the point is that even if you asked everybody's immediate managers to decide who to lay off, you'd have huge mistakes being made.

A central bureaucracy like DOGE is so much farther removed from that situation that it's not even funny. There is simply no way that it has the expertise to conduct layoffs, and it was obvious from the beginning. Companies facing layoffs know that they will lose unreplaceable employees, but they have to do so due to immediate financial pressures, nothing like what the government faces.

So, DOGE was either a stupid idea created by absolute morons, or it was a cover for bad actors who never intended to do what they claimed. Or a little from column a, and a little from column b.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago

Also, the methodology was awful. Offer buyouts for people to leave. That means the people who are the best at their job and most confident in finding a new job left.

load more comments
view more: next ›