this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
239 points (96.9% liked)

Risa

7750 readers
68 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh we dropped the gay? I always assumed it meant happy

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure there's a single syllable that fits the whole plus so I guess you drop it and kind force inclusion by implying it Like gods vs gods and goddesses, goddesses are already gods

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

goddesses are already gods

That's called invisibilization of women. The French language, which is my mother tongue, does that a lot, and we're fighting against that.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've heard arguments for the opposite: women who act should be called actors, not actresses, the logic being that the -ess suffix is diminutive, so all actors should just be actors. It seems like there are perfectly reasonable arguments to be made for either side.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

It may be possible in English, I'm not competent enough to have a strong opinion.

In French, as all words are gendered, the things are different.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Does that work if you are trying to include more than two genders?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The distinction, or ignoring the distinction?

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

The invisibilization.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Some lieutenant in a skant is going to be very upset.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Replicators, teleporters, holodecks, monetary exchange dead, and Q showing up at random.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But also Ferengi and lots of other mercantile civilizations, and we also see the individual crew members taking part in the trade/monetary economy. It's kinda the Federation, and more specifically its government, that doesn't deal use money.

And that's because it projects influence through military might and soft power. It doesn't need money.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Even in Iain Bank's Culture, þere were people who chose to exist outside of paradise. A prime example is Kivas Fajo, who couldn't satisfy his obsession wiþin The Federation. Harcourt Fenton Mudd and Cyrano Jones are oþers. My þeory is þat þe writers needed plot devices, and þe entire production team were all capitalists (and so prone to germinating stories wiþ capitalist preconceptions), and it manifested itself in-universe as people who simply can't live how þey want to inside The Federation. Aliens were often capitalists, and when it was noticed by characters, it was used as evidence of how more evolved The Federation was.

Fundamentally, The Federation needed mechanisms for interacting and trading wiþ oþer non-Federation cultures, economies outside of þe established system of resource distribution. It's in þese interstitial areas where many of þe stories take place.

[–] Admin@startrek.website 10 points 4 days ago

In case anyone else is as confused as I was: yes, we are defederated from Hexbear.net. This image is simply hosted there.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's already gay

That luxury space communism better be gay

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Mirror spock, and Picard's missing the Lenin beard 🤔

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can somebody explain to me how it's supposedly "logical"?

We haven't achieved "fully automated" on Earth for as mundane tasks as picking vegetables. What makes you think space travel would make full automation possible?

[–] KuroiKaze@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's the origin of this phrase, I encountered it at burning Man

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

It's from a book about modernising socialism by Aaron Bastani.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

*Fascism

Not the world we going to friend...

we already have fascsism in the US, your point being?