this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
51 points (93.2% liked)

Videos

962 readers
2 users here now

Community for posting videos.

Yhteisö videoille.

It is recommended to put the video's length in title.

Example: "Really interesting video [6:09]"

Videon pituus suositellaan laitettavaksi otsikkoon.

Esimerkki: "Tosi kiinnostava video [6:09]"

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Get one of these and you can just steal all the cars lol

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] henfredemars 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The efficiency of this can’t possibly be very good. Can it?

[–] arin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Better than the gas combustion engine car it's lifting up amd carrying

[–] swicano@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty neat, I wonder how it plans the movement and maksure it doesn't clothesline the car on something. Maybe the facility would need mounted sensors like valve lighthouses? Seems hard to know that the car roof won't scrape or anything if all the sensors are down in the skateboard

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not a bad point. Probably preconfigured limits at location, or ignored setting set by people. I.e. we know we have high enough clearance for up to this much, we won't set it off on bigger cars. On automated car park silos probably just a bar at the entrance (like they already exists) to allow only cars below a certain height.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I imagine this could (at least modestly) reduce the size of new parking lots or garages and increase the capacity of existing ones if the extra room given to maneuver is no longer needed because of these robots ability to zero-turn a vehicle into or out of virtually any space.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Very modestly. Humans need the same amount of space to maneuver more or less because the size of the car is the limiting factor.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Here me out : how about making smaller cars ?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes I'm sure there will be zero edge cases that will cause someone to die from this

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most warehouses have similar, death by robot or a moron in a forklift?

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whichever gets the funnier video

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The ones where the rows of storage go domino

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now I want these just roaming around the city moving cars to maximize parking space.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why even have cars when these skateboards can carry a whole car on it's back while nimbly maneuvering!?

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Smoothness of the ride. Comfort, safety standards, maybe also familiarity.

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can't tell if this is AI gen, but it looks like something that would be AI gen

The robot seems to move very jerkily, (although that could be because it's sped up)

But this seems like too much magic. There's no obvious sensors or wheels or motors to make the thing move autonomously


Edit: also that squeezing motion shouldn't work to pick up the car. The tire is made of rubber and therefore quite grippy, so the arms would have to rotate themselves (because they can't slide underneath the rubber)

As well, there doesn't appear to be any mechanism on top of the thing to hold the weight of the car. There's no way those flimsy arms, in a 3rd class lever configuration, are capable of lifting a 1 ton vehicle

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

PLEASE TIP VALET BOT.