this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
316 points (99.7% liked)

science

23103 readers
193 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Scientists in Britain say ancient humans may have learned to make fire far earlier than previously believed, after uncovering evidence that deliberate fire-setting took place in what is now eastern England around 400,000 years ago.

The findings, described in the journal Nature, push back the earliest known date for controlled fire-making by roughly 350,000 years. Until now, the oldest confirmed evidence had come from Neanderthal sites in what is now northern France dating to about 50,000 years ago.

The discovery was made at Barnham, a Paleolithic site in Suffolk that has been excavated for decades. A team led by the British Museum identified a patch of baked clay, flint hand axes fractured by intense heat and two fragments of iron pyrite, a mineral that produces sparks when struck against flint.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starik@lemmy.zip 89 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is 390,000 years before God created the Earth, which makes it even more impressive

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Reminds me of a joke that sounds like it came from either disc world or hitchhikers guide, but I don't know the source. God created the world 6,000 years before present, this was very annoying to the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Chinese since it disrupted their civilizations for a couple of days. Also. In the beginning god created light, he then had an arrow shot at him by some very blinded humans from Egypt.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Don’t forget light and darkness.

[–] PeterLG@theblower.au 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@MicroWave

It's important to note that they are not talking about humans as we understand the term generally, Homo sapiens, but genus Homo, which started back in the H.habilis days.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We're all species, in the Homo.

They love you when you're keeping the fire.

[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hominins. Fuckin shit up since 398,000 BCE.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

According to your link and the linked Wikipedia article, that word includes the non-human great apes, which seems rather unfair. It's only the genus homo within the family of hominids who discovered fire. "Human" is probably fine, depending on the exact definition used it can definitely include our direct ancestor species while excluding chimpanzees. But it can definitely also be understood to mean specifically homo sapiens, so there's a lot of potential for misunderstandings.

[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a difference between hominins and hominids. The link I posted is regarding hominins.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you click on the link to "Hominini" in the Wiktionary article, it says "Hominini - A taxonomic tribe within the family Hominidae – humans; or the chimpanzees and humans."

Granted, that's different from what I said, as it's only the chimpanzees that might be included, but according to Wiktionary it just isn't clear cut.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

it also notes that chimpanzees are not always included within hominini

[–] io@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

has noone ever told a chimp to make fire? like with a lighter?

[–] ushmel@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago

There's a whole line of movies about this concept

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Sheesh, these are tough—sounds the same but has different meanings. Didn’t know that problem went so far back.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Read this at lunch today! Very convincing evidence.

Rob Davis, a Paleolithic archaeologist at the British Museum, said the combination of high temperatures, controlled burning and pyrite fragments shows “how they were actually making the fire and the fact they were making it.”

Iron pyrite does not occur naturally at Barnham. Its presence suggests the people who lived there deliberately collected it because they understood its properties and could use it to ignite tinder.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

I’m way more interested that they were apparently also making thumb tacks.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but how long have they been spitting hot fire?

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

scientists were wrong, say scientists

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I mean... that's the entire point of science

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

it's far more honorable to admit your mistakes then gaslighting everyone into believing you were right all along.

you should try it sometime. I think this would be the perfect opportunity.