this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
291 points (99.7% liked)

politics

26918 readers
2294 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump official says funds will be released ‘only when states prove they are being spent legitimately’

The changes to US childcare services as part of a response to a viral video, made by a self-described “independent journalist” and rightwing influencer, that purported to discover massive fraud at daycare centers operated by Somali Americans in Minneapolis.

However, other news outlets have not been able to verify the claims made in the video. Allegations of exploitation of Minnesota's social safety net have also been extensively covered by local and national news media over the past several years, and prosecutors brought charges over one allegedly massive scheme during the Biden administration.

In recent weeks, Trump has intensified his xenophobic attacks on Somali Americans, including his long-running nemesis Ilhan Omar, a representative from Minnesota who is Somali American and came to the US as a refugee. He has said that Omar is "garbage" and said Somalia is "no good for a reason".

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I was wondering why tiktok algorithm starting spewing tons of self proclaimed journalists confronting Somali daycare centers proving some kind of fraud. Felt very propagandish

[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Trump will literally starve children, to distract the American people, from the fact that he raped children. And that, is fucking wild

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

So, the dog whistle here is: "Because of the BROWN people from SHITHOLE countries who are here ILLEGALLY anyway, no one can have nice things!"

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago

Why are they allowed to do this

Are they even?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Happy fucking new year!

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

Rich people doing the math and trying to decide if literal slavery will be cheaper than Bread and Circuses

[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The president has a documented history of liking it when kids get fucked.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 28 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

This country so desperately wants loads of children, but makes it so challenging to support the kids

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

And then the same people who want to get birth rates up say you shouldn't have children if you can't afford them

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

They need to children so that they can grow up and die as solders.

[–] h3ll3rsh4nks@ani.social 16 points 21 hours ago

It's because they want the children to yern for the mines. THAT'S what "make America great again" REALLY means.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 21 hours ago

They want fetuses because that makes jeebus happy

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The GOP motto is, "fuck them kids"

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Love a fetus though.

When he's not fucking kids one way, he's fucking them another.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

As long as Elon can afford his 50th yacht and fund a robot army for himself, that’s the most important thing.

[–] tehsillz@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

And he doesnt care for his own children so why would he care about anyone elses

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Project 2025. So that women will have to stay home.

Ain't gonna go like they think it will.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why won't it? Because I think it will. Americans are complacent.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Women are not having babies anymore. And more and more of us are taking a very firm stand on this.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Honestly, I don't wonder if the cons hope for this exact thing.

Meaning, they hope the tradwife types/the Quiverfull Movement, etc., will be popping out lots of (white) babies, while all of those other - and here, sub in whatever - feminists, liberals, LGBTQ, etc. - people will be convinced not to do so.

I still don't think it will work out the way they think it would - first of all, it's not like liberals don't come from conservative backgrounds. Same for feminists and LGBTQ. Also, I just don't think there are enough people that are going to take up fringe movements like tradwife and Quiverfull stuff to really counterbalance birth rates at a national level.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How would it? Just because they have an insane idea doesn't mean A actually does lead to B.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This will definitely encourage more people to have kids.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The US is just speed running Japan in the 90s so they can have a couple of lost decades and lose all significance in the world.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago
[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is more than lost decades. America isn't rec9vering from this.

[–] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

y'all aren't thinking depraved enough: when these families can't afford to take care of their children, a soldier is born.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ooh! Can we get the deflation too??

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

Deflation to wages? Sure.

Everything else will stay expensive.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

OK but they were having the wrong KIND of kids

[–] Xander707@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Daycare is woke. Just another obvious win for the average American and MAGA voter.

/s

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

misread "average American and MAGA voter" as "average American anal MAGA voter"

makes sense because they are being fucked

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

It’s like taking candy from a baby. In that it is taking food from babies.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Gotta pay for the tax cuts for billionaires somehow.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because that's what a total asshole would do.

Anyway....all sorts of meat products have vegan food smeared all over them... Like ketchup! In your face everyone! You guys thought you were being funny. In reality we vegans have been trolling your ass the entire time! So don't worry, you're not as big an asshole as the guy taking childcare services away.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Not sure I understand the background here, but I was reading a thread on r/vegan and there was a buffet of food, with a portion of it marked "vegan". It was mostly untouched, because there are lots of idiots that think "vegan? gross!"

The label was removed - not clear if that was intentional or accidental - and it got cleared out. Because it was just completely innocuous stuff, actually, but people have been programmed to think vegan is some kind of foreign concept. Labeling something that has not been tainted with animal products as "vegan", even if it's, say, a bunch of apple slices, causes people to steer clear.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Is that how the law was written for disbursements?