this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
42 points (80.9% liked)

Programming

24429 readers
271 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We recently wrote about Torvalds' atypically subtle and nuanced position on the use of LLM bots in coding. It seems that the reasons have suddenly become a little clearer.

Google's Antigravity LLM has been winning other friends of late, including Register columnist Mark Pesce, who wrote that "vibe coding will deliver a wonderful proliferation of personalized software." Some other big names in the world of FOSS have also come out in favor of LLM coding assistants recently, including Redis creator Salvatore "Antirez" Sanfilippo, who wrote "don't fall into the anti-AI hype." Said hype is, of course, a subject about which Torvalds opined previously.

Torvalds' position has been more moderate, which is not entirely like his former self. He is famed for his outbursts at Nvidia, GitHub, third-party companies, and kernel contributors. We could go on, but you get the picture.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Say it with me: It's not vibe coding if you read and understand the code.

That is not vibes, that is knowing what you're doing and working based off of a suggestion.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

This

I also sometimes use AI for small bits and pieces and the vast majority of the time it gets about 10-20% wrong which I then have to fix

There is a net-gain in time on these small bits and pieces, but it's not really able to do more than that

[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I read it correctly, he used a LLM to help him write Python for a hobby project. I think this falls into an open minded, "who cares?". Come back when he used it for something intended for public or commercial use.

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He never would in critical code such as Linux kernel

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because anyone can fall for stupid shit.

Tldr, he's fine with it because he was lazy

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ITT: Anything that makes work easier for the same end goal is laziness.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The guy literally said that he didn't want to bother learning python and that it's why he used this crap.

If that's not intellectual laziness I don't know what is.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't be a stupid shit. You use things on the daily without full comprehension of them.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If you write code without understanding what you're doing, to the point where an AI is achieving better results, you should question your choices.

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Today we knew that Linus Torvalds is lazy and stupid ✍️

[–] tetrislife@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

I think it is intellectual laziness to do Python just for its ecosystem when saner options abound.