more and more [Americans] are calling for a revolution—and not all of them think peace is an option
Maybe this is true but I don't think a selection of tiktok videos is a good metric for this
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
78 points (97.6% liked)
Progressive Politics
3656 readers
572 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lmfao. I get banned for this shit and now it’s being talked about?
TBH I don't really trust anything that TropicalDingDong fellow says.
Why?
Do you actually even know why?
We've had lots of arguments in the past. You don't exactly appear like a Tankie, but you're definitely not a supporter of the DNC and you recently made a joke about poisoning strangers with a package that sprays Urushiol .
you're definitely not a supporter of the DNC
I’m fucking dying 🤣
We've had precisely one argument in the past.
It was me warning you that you were engaging in a form of slippery slope with regards to antisemitism. I pushed back on you for that and you decided from then on we were enemies.
And as I said in my joke, I would only ever extract urushiol for entirely legitimate purposes.
Oh we've had a lot of arguments. A LOT. At least one since I moved to this instance.
I'll take your word on that. But I'm standing by what I said. We were fine until I called you out for antisemitism.
Feel free to link to that, I've never discriminated on basis of religion.
Great. No worries and will do. Also, it looks like you've been deleting your alts, and I'm not sure which one you were under at the time. It will make the look up process easier if you can remind me your old account handle. I thought you were at .world?
I've been on Lemmy.World, Piefed.World, and now I've moved over to Feddit.Online (because the World admins support the ML developers directly and indirectly).
Wait a second here. You're actually a supporter of the DNC? Really? Holy shit.
The DNC platform:
Tax the Rich
Ban PACs
Public Option healthcare identical to Germany's
Protect the Environment
Ban discrimination
Antimonopoly enforcement
That's the platform on paper. Whew is any of it. They never even tried to do any of it when they controlled all branches of government.
They get the same corporate donations as the GOP, and those are the same investors they run to constantly. The only reason they even exist is as a lesser of two evils in the useless FPTP election system the US uses.
There is no way you made it here without seeing my other response to a nearly identical reply.
And yet here we are.
Sure. I'll believe it when I see it. Historically, recent history at least, they have stood for the oligarchy and doing whatever they could to keep progressives out of office. Their most important goal is raising money and maintaining two party rule. Don't get me wrong, DNC every single time over GOP, but let's be honest. That's not much of a bar to step over, and I'm surprised you don't expect better.
DNC have not had more than 48 senate seats in 13 years. When they did have 58 senators in 2010, for less than 2 months of congress in session, they caucused with 2 independents to have supermajority to pass the Affordable Care Act which gave free healthcare to over 50 Million americans and made healthcare more affordable to a comparable number of people, they would have passed that Public Option healthcare plan if not for Independent Senator Joe Leiberman refusing.
They also banned PACs in 2003, something they were attempting since 1995, and it lasted until 2007-2010 at which point the SCOTUS deemed it unconstitutional in the Citizens United ruling.
As far as banning discriminattion, protecting the environment, antimonopoly enforcement, and taxing the rich: there are examples of all of those things from every single DNC presidency and congress.
I agree, they support shitty candidates way too much. Hence, their consistent minority. Remember when they chose that same Joe Leiberman as the VP candidate? Big brain time. I see that question all the time "what can they do?" Well, if they can't do shit, get out. Let someone else try. Support a ban on Congressional insider trading. I still say, Dems over the Magats is an easy choice. Why can't we have a choice between left and right, not right and nutter-right? The DNC platform of today is about what the GOP platform was in the 50s. That's not OK.
Voters choose candidates in Primary Elections.
If you think taxing the rich is right wing, then maybe it's you standing in our way rather than vice versa.
Holy shit. And there goes the strawman. I said nothing of the sort and have decided to just block you. It is like talking to a kitchen table.
Just got banned for news@Lemmy for a suggestion that I may have been banned from somewhere at sometime but not news
Welcome the gestapo.lemmy.world
You were stupid enough to admit to ban evasion which is a bannable offense, which led me to look at the modlog, so, yeah, banning you from my communities as well.
But I wasn’t banned from new or politics lol
You're banned in News, World, and Politics at this point. I expect that will widen.
I mean, you did that not me.
Well, I did Politics and World, News was someone else. But I wouldn't have known if you hadn't pointed out being banned from News. 😉
I did not.
best I can do is shrugging tom meme.
It’s okay. Within…3ish months I’ll be in another country any I can stop subscribing to US news and encourage them to help themselves.
I can focus on NOT US… oh gosh that sounds good.
Inb4 "removed by moderators"
Its moving squarely into much more mainstream channels and spaces. Lawmakers are calling for a general strike. Not to say moderators wont do what they do, but this isn't a fringe view any more. Not in 2026.
I haven't heard about calls for a general strike. Who is calling for one?
Oh btw if you talk about revolution in this community you will be banned. So, good luck commenting
Okay, but a lot of the people who have and use guns are on the side of the authoritarians.
I wager that they're probably just more vocal about it. There is a lot of work to do to build a bigger and stronger resistance, but if it came down to it I think only 25% of the civilian gun owners would be fighting for the Trump Admin's civil war. The bigger issue is the non-civillian guns and tanks and bombs.
Buy a gun
Good clip in the intro: