this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Pulse of Truth

2507 readers
64 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

Commenting rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One developer is struggling with the social implications of a drive-by AI character attack.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Watched the Ars conversation on this one. Aurich pulled the article after a firestorm in the comments, in which the quotes attributed to the AI agent operator appeared to be non-existent (the human subject of the article weighed in to corroborate this). Ars Technica has promised to investigate and update readers after the weekend.

[–] lemmydev2 2 points 6 months ago
[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Yup, and Ars has followed up with an initial explanation at https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/ . Hopefully they'll go into greater detail about what happened.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 1 points 6 months ago

I will just thank you now. Thank you.