this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

25522 readers
343 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
UlrikHD@programming.dev
bugsmith@programming.dev
Spyro@programming.dev
7
Decentralized Microfrontend Module Federation Architecture (programming.dev)
submitted 1 day ago by xoron@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://positive-intentions.com/docs/technical/architecture

i cooked a bit too hard on this. i don't advise you use this approach. its something I wanted to investigate for myself.

https://webpack.js.org/concepts/module-federation/#promise-based-dynamic-remotes

i was already using microfrontends for my project. when i came across dynamic remotes, i figured i could use it for statics redundency management. (tbh... a problem that doesnt exist.)

my project is far from finished and it would make sense to add additional safety nets for static-resource-integrity, but the basic concept seems to work and i wanted to share some details ive put together.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here