Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
371 points (99.5% liked)
World News
53875 readers
2093 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My heart goes out to Musk....
No worries! The stock price keeps going up, so it doesn't matter how many cars Tesla actually sells.
Tesla global sales by year compared to Ford and Toyota
The incredible thing isn't the slight down tick in sales last year (on par with most international car companies), but that Tesla has a market cap that exceeds both of these mega-manufacturers despite being dwarfed in both assets and revenues.
On paper, they have so much farther to fall than what these short term sales shortfalls imply. But then this is a car company that's defied gravity for a decade. Consider that each vehicle Tesla sells reflects $700k - $1M in market cap. On a $60k-$110k vehicle.
All their valuation is predicated on future predicted returns on the technology rather than current sales figures. And I don't know when that will actually change.
I think the 3 things Tesla has/had going for them was...
-
Car sales growth. The had some pretty ridiculous growth in sales for a few years there.
-
Captive Market. Pretty much everyone I know with a Tesla charges at home, or at a Tesla supercharger. They've got the Apple ecosystem lock in for the "fuel" you put in the car. This walled garden approach basically lets Apple print money.
-
Technology. FSD, autopilot, and manufacturing. Tesla presented as a very tech focused company that was dumping money into R&D similar to how Amazon built up in the early 2000s. Investors love companies that are poised to control the entire market in the future.
Pretty much all 3 of these pillars have collapsed now. Their car sales are in a huge global slump. More cars are available that can charge on other charging networks, and those charging networks get bigger and better every day. Elon's FSD is basically vaporware at this point, and the high degree of automation Tesla was touting in their factories came back to bite them in the ass.
This leads to my favorite recent quote about stocks though... "The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." Let's face it, Tesla stock is a bubble, AI is a huge bubble. The problem isn't knowing that there is a bubble, the problem is knowing when that bubble is going to burst.
Tesla stock price is a load of crap, pushed up solely by Elon chuds.
What a beautiful way to present the situation.
It’s honestly quite unhinged when you look at how much each vehicle contributes to their market cap.
It's very clear that at this point, insofar as there is any logic at all to the decision making of people investing in Tesla (and there's very little evidence of that), they're evaluating it as a software company, not a car company.
This seems to be largely based on the notion that Tesla is the world leader in self-driving, and poised to become the world leader in other areas of automation. And that would, admittedly, mostly justify their very high share price, if there was literally any evidence it was true. Of course, what they actually have is a self-driving system that is only number one in fatalities caused, and a bunch of faked demos of robots made using low paid remote operators.
Tesla is easily the single best demonstration of how fucked our economic system really is. That a company can so blatantly lie, over and over, about what their products can actually do, and somehow continue to see their share price increase tells you everything you need to know about how utterly fictitious the entire notion of the stock market is.
they’re evaluating it as a software company, not a car company.
That still doesn't justify the valuation. Tesla's market cap is 3x Oracle's, ffs. It's half of a Microsoft. No software they produce can justify this valuation.
Palantir and NVIDIA have the same hyper-inflated position. Nothing in their projected revenue figures can explain their company's valuation, unless you're just hand-waving and predicting 10-20x growth over the next decade.
Tesla is easily the single best demonstration of how fucked our economic system really is. That a company can so blatantly lie, over and over, about what their products can actually do, and somehow continue to see their share price increase tells you everything you need to know about how utterly fictitious the entire notion of the stock market is.
Warren Buffet definitely gearing up to print off another deck of "Fell For It Again" awards. Only question is when they get handed out.
unless you're just hand-waving and predicting 10-20x growth over the next decade.
That's exactly what they're doing.
The problem is that hyper-advanced automation is essentially unpriceable. When your potential market penetration is "replace all human labour" your profit potential is infinite.
The real is issue is not how they're pricing the potential upside, its that none of these companies have remotely demonstrated that they have the ability to actually produce that upside. It's an entire industry shilling a fantasy on the back of some very impressive sales demos.
The problem is that hyper-advanced automation is essentially unpriceable.
I mean, I could point you to a few economics journalists who would argue otherwise. Ed Zitron's been screaming about the downfall of AI for the last two years straight.
But the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent, as the saying goes.
It’s an entire industry shilling a fantasy on the back of some very impressive sales demos.
Doesn't hurt to have a bunch of tech-friendly goobers running state and federal governments who are turning out the taxpayer's wallet to finance these hallucinations.
I mean, I could point you to a few economics journalists who would argue otherwise. Ed Zitron’s been screaming about the downfall of AI for the last two years straight.
I feel like you're only reading every other sentence of what I say. In this instance, you seem to have fixated on this part, but sailed right past the part where I said that there's zero evidence that anyone can actually produce hyper-advanced automation. I never argued that it was a rational decision to go all in on this possibility, and that's entirely clear from my previous comments.
Ed Zitron is completely correct, but he's also making exactly the same argument I am; that these people cannot actually achieve the technological revolution they are promising. That doesn't change the fact that, if their wish granting genie was real, it would basically have unlimited upside. The problem is not how they're pricing the outcome, the problem is how they're evaluating the probability of achieving the outcome.
there’s zero evidence that anyone can actually produce hyper-advanced automation
There's plenty of evidence (Waymo, for instance, or Xaiome) that companies can produce "good enough" advanced automation. Tesla's just not the guy to make it happen. Same with AI. Very possible to produce useful tools (Alibaba's Deepseek, Insilico Medicine's Pharma.AI, etc) with LLMs. Sam Altman's just not doing it.
Ed Zitron is completely correct, but he’s also making exactly the same argument I am; that these people cannot actually achieve the technological revolution they are promising.
Zitron's heavily focused on the economics. Specifically, he's fixated on the cost of running the American data centers relative to their prospective future revenues and profit horizons. He's not even "anti-Tech" relatively speaking. He's just reading balance sheets and doing basic math on depreciation rate of hardware to conclude the current business models won't work.
This isn't to say it can't happen. It's to say these businesses won't make it happen.
The problem is not how they’re pricing the outcome
This is where we're in disagreement. They're pricing their outcomes totally wrong, even in their self-proclaimed "best case scenario". That's leading them toward malinvestment - heavy spending on hardware and brute force algorithms. Marginal investment on material applications and workflow integrations that benefit anyone.
This isn't a probability problem where they can luck into a multi-trillion dollar windfall.
Again, we're still in that "reading every over sentence" mode. For example, I say "hyper-advanced automation" and you reply claiming that "Good enough" automation is perfectly achievable. Yes. I know. I never said it wasn't. I never said anything about good enough automation at all. And that kind of thing goes on throughout your response here.
By all means continue your conversation with whoever you think is making all these arguments, but they bare little resemblance to anything I'm saying, so there's really no point in my responding any further.
It’s very clear that at this point, insofar as there is any logic at all to the decision making of people investing in Tesla (and there’s very little evidence of that), they’re evaluating it as a software company, not a car company.
Nah, the logic to the decision is that other people are buying a lot of tesla stock and the price keeps going up. It's very nearly a ponzi scheme. It has value completely detached to what the company is doing. It's tulips, crypto, beanie babies. Most institutional investors realizes this, they also are trying to get in and get out without holding the bag.
It’s very clear that at this point, insofar as there is any logic at all to the decision making of people investing in Tesla (and there’s very little evidence of that), they’re evaluating it as a software company, not a car company.
So if sales are down 50% or more in Europe, where are these cars sold?
For starters, SpaceX, which operates the Starlink satellite network, has purchased over 1,000 Tesla Cybertrucks as of late 2025.
Meanwhile, Police departments across the U.S. - particularly in California - are increasingly adopting Tesla vehicles (Model Y, Model 3, and Cybertruck) for patrol and administrative use. South Pasadena (CA) became the first U.S. city to switch its entire police patrol fleet to electric vehicles. Other departments, including Anaheim and Fremont, are using Tesla Model Ys for patrol. The Las Vegas Metro Police Department is introducing a fleet of 10 Cybertrucks for patrol and tactical use, specifically highlighting their safety features (bullet-resistant). A Texas school district created it's own police force to be equipped with 9 Tesla cruisers two years back.
The Model Y is the new Crown Vic.
Remember WeWork? Lots of dumb people with money and if enough dumb people sustain their dumbness it doesn’t really matter. Stock goes up.
Remember WeWork?
Boy howdy. You know Adam Neumann is still worth $2.2B?
Crazy how that happens.
Frustrating as hell. Losing a few mil means nothing to billions.
I’m sure this had nothing to do with it, yeah? Fuck the PedoNazis and the Swasticar company.
Ah, what a time to be alive: Pedo nazis are trying to take over the U.S. (and other parts of the world), and we‘re driving around in swasticars. Sounds like the plot of some 80‘s movie, but somehow it’s the reality we live in. And, somehow, where I live (central Europe), people are still voting for right-wing parties, seeing what is happening, seeing history repeating itself. This ignorance is infathomable to me, and I can only hope that either we will never suffer the consequences of what we‘re voting for or we learn it for real this time.
In fairness, none of those countries liked the Romans, so...
And as the Visigoths ransacked Rome, Emperor Honorius was heard yelling, “not my Cybertruck!“
We should get those numbers lower. Every Tesla is one too much.
Higher is better in this case. 100% preferably.
Trump could get them down 500% or even 700%
Well, I meant the number of sold cars. But yes, a 100% reduction would be great!
Any company with a functional board of directors would have fired the CEO yesterday.
This is not a legitimate business. Institutional investors should be running away from this company.
Tesla cars also fail the mandatory safety inspections in Europe at an alarming rate. That's not a good look when buying a new car.
Luckily most his real income is from the US government and consumers cannot impoverish this level headed and clear minded ketamine addict with their misguided purchasing decisions.
The FY2025 vs FY2024 numbers were plenty damning. Comparing January 2026 to previous Januaries is kinda silly given how much monthly fluctuation there is, and how few markets actually report on Monthly numbers
I am sure this is what Rubio meant when he said that they "need Europe to help save the West" the other day. Right?
Tja
Don't you know that Tesla will be building a Dyson Sphere together with SpaceX at a 100 Morbillion valuation? Who cares about cars?
They're using their army of AI powered robots right?
Look. I know Norway be cool in this, but I'm actually kind of shocked at just 93%.
Edit: Though, looking at the figures, makes sense. Business as usual if you don't consider the one-off spike they're comparing to to get that figured.
So what is it for the year then?
If I'm reading your comment correctly, if they have no delivery that month... Their "sales" would be pretty much 0.
So why the fuck are we cherry picking numbers unrepresentative of reality? This is some right wing type of shit.
Oh that's why:
2024: 24,259 new Tesla cars registered in Norway. 2025: 34,285 new Tesla cars registered in Norway.
Got no clue on reliability of the source, but there's 3 on top of my search seem to line up.
IIRC tax reasons made it very much smarter to buy a Tesla in Dec 2025 than in Jan 2026. Norway has had a drop in sales, but stuff like this skews the numbers.
"Gonna buy a nazi mobile yet?"
"Nah, I have ethics."
"They will be more expensive next year though"
Runs to the dealership
Yeah, the numbers for Norway are when the cars are registered, which happens when they arrive at the dealer. Since Tesla ships their cars in large batches, the numbers are difficult to compare.
I’m (unfortunately) certain that most of the decline in sales will disappear once the first big delivery of 2026 comes ashore.
Looking at 24 vs 25, numbers don't lie
2024: 24,259 new Tesla cars registered in Norway. 2025: 34,285 new Tesla cars registered in Norway. https://bestsellingcarsblog.com/2026/01/norway-full-year-2025-record-market-39-5-tesla-and-model-y-at-all-time-high/
That’s a good start.
Textbook case of how to absolutely obliterate first-mover advantage. Pretty remarkable actually.
Tesla is a scam and money laundering operation.
I took a tour of their factory in the mid-2010s because a friend worked there in their training and development department, he was in charge of everyone who wrote assembly guides/processes.
He told me they’ve always operated at a loss and relied on “shifty Elon” and that he’d never buy one but the money was great working there.
Nowadays I see so many incompetent Asian and Indian buffoons driving around the Bay Area in their Teslas, supporting this shit company and its wannabe Nazi CEO.
You can tell someone is incompetent because they're Asian or Indian?... Holy racism Batman!