this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
130 points (99.2% liked)

Lord Of The Rings Memes

1406 readers
296 users here now

A comm for Lord Of The Rings Memes!

Rules:

  1. Follow the ToS of Piefed.social

  2. Don't be too rough with each other! We're here to appreciate, and sometimes lightly rib, Tolkien's fantastic creation, and all of its derivative works. Arguments happen, but remember, in the words of Tolkien, that food and cheer and good song are what make a merrier world!

  3. AI content will be removed at moderator discretion. We ultimately want to keep AI content in this comm to a minimum, so while unknowingly sharing an AI meme might not always merit a removal, things like AI videos and the like will generally be removed.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That shot of Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli running across a field probably also cost a fortune.

  • Actors' pay rates, which for these well-known actors would be fairly high. (Multiply this by several times if you want to do multiple takes.)

  • Costumes, makeup, hairdressing, backup costumes in case something breaks.

  • It's an airborne shot, so you'll need a helicopter or high-end drone and a pilot for it.

  • Camera purchase/rental.

  • Paying for the composer of the musical score.

  • Previous location scouting trip all over NZ.

  • Possibly had to pay someone money in order to get permission to film here.

  • Director and other associated film crew's pay rates.

  • Transportation and support crew; catering; medical on standby; etc.

  • And for each of the above, add transportation to NZ, or factor in paying premium prices to find a local option.

Overall, probably still a cheaper shot than the CGI shot. (Especially since some of these expenses would be shared with every other shot in the movie.) But still, I'm sure this was not a cheap shot to produce, actually. And it still cost 'a fortune' to make that shot.

helicopter or high-end drone

Given that the LOTR films were made in the early 2000s, I believe only one of these options would have been available.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why I don't give a shit about superhero movies.

There's a certain something that's just missing. It's also why old school action movies were some of the best, they didn't have CGI, so had to do it for real.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Modern action scenes just completely fail to understand violence and impact.

80s slug fests are infinitely better than modern action scenes that feature more cuts than a diced onion.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

The OG gone in 60 seconds was a masterpiece, and it's mostly because all the driving and all the stunts are real.

The editing and sound was also brilliant.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't the entire point of CGI that it's easier and thus cheaper than practical effects, shooting on location etc.? I wonder how instead, it became this weird mix of absurd budgets, lame CGI and lame scripts at some point.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

No, that wasn’t the point. It’s just another tool, not a wholesale replacement.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't really like CGI. You would think it would make everything feel more immersive but it make things seem fake to me? Idk, it's the same for videos game graphics these days for me. I'd rather play a fun game with 98-04 graphics. I wonder if it has to do with ADHD.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, lord of the rings hardly had any CGI.

If you ignore gollum, and the fell beasts, and the trolls, and the thousands-strong armies, and...

Stop hating on CGI. It's not CGI that makes films bad.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago

CGI is a tool, not a replacement for good composition, is the point.