this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
514 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82669 readers
2693 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

damn you think they would have just used cloud flare click on the bus

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That reminds me, 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Anaeijon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I know about it, but didn't recognize the code. So I assumed, they encoded some text to make it harder to read. So I tried decoding it.

Turns out, if you decode this in UTF-16, it turns into a japanese sentence

契ȑ璝寣䇘앖噣삈

Which means (according to DeepL)

The sound of the wind rustling through the trees

And now I'm confused, why.

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

That's not Japanese, there's some Chinese and Korean characters in there too. Turns out if you decode random bytes as UTF chars you will probably get a CJK character lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

Apparently you can get that sequence from an AI bot if you ask it "correctly". But rules for thee and all that.

[–] dan@upvote.au 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

lol I still have a screenshot of Digg from when every article on the home page had this key in it.

[–] eah@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Please share.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its good that you have enough self-control to hand over your keys when you've had too much to drink.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

blaming? shouldnt they have celebrated how much people utilize their beloved slopmachines?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude an idiotic thing is one of the biggest sellers for dig was their stupid AI slop notifications that helped tell you what the article was about. I fucking hated that so much.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

they are just hoping to datamine JUST like reddit to profit of its user, but worst. a corporate structure like diggs wouldnt eventually want to use AI so they can sell the data to GOOGLE, or other large AI to train on.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

They had their own AI built in that summarize everything. 

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 223 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

When the Digg beta launched, we immediately noticed posts from SEO spammers noting that Digg still carried meaningful Google link authority. Within hours, we got a taste of what we'd only heard rumors about. The internet is now populated, in meaningful part, by sophisticated AI agents and automated accounts. We knew bots were part of the landscape, but we didn't appreciate the scale, sophistication, or speed at which they'd find us. We banned tens of thousands of accounts. We deployed internal tooling and industry-standard external vendors. None of it was enough.

I love how the SEO industry pretends they’re anything but a caustic cancer leeching off literally everything.

“Oh, but discoverability of small business!” Yeah… I’d punch you if I saw you, SEO jerks. The Futurama movie was right.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't you have to buy an account at Digg? If so, were the bots buying the accounts? And if so, who was buying them?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (12 children)

No you just had to request the account and then one would be provided to you when they open it up. I finally received my account a couple months ago. It was worse than it is here. I was hoping for some good alternatives to Reddit but overall Lemmy is only halfway there digg was only a third of the way there.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Nah it sucked. I was on it. It was just lemmy but with less features and with less content. It was dead the moment it started because it did nothing.

I don't understand how they even think it could succeed.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, but isn't Lemmy itself a bit of a "less features" version of Reddit? I'm not here for features, I'm here to get away from toxic Reddit mods because fuck spez.

I'll admit, I might have taken the bet that "reddit but not reddit" would hold at least some interest.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kind of but decentralization really makes it up for it. Digg didn't even have custom communities let alone decentralization.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

I have my complaints with Lemmy but I was astounded with how bad Digg was. It's like none of them actually used these community based apps.

load more comments (3 replies)

Dead internet ~~theory~~ reality

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

These things need to grow from grassroots.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They should bring back google circles

THAT'S WHAT IT WAS CALLED! I've been trying to remember lol.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Unironically. But only on the condition they bring back Google from 2011

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, the first rebirth as a run-of-the-mill article aggregator was better. A lot of it I'd have already seen elsewhere, but occasionally it'd have something interesting that I missed.

Whatever they do, they'll still be riding the name of a very dead horse.

[–] Sat@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I tried using it and was kinda hopeful, but NSFW was against their TOS which is a no go.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Prude and ambicious. Executives these days...

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›