this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
120 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28910 readers
1847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘Of course there’s going to be retaliation,’ says one expert. ‘It may be that this is what Trump’s interested in’

For decades, the US and its allies have painted Iran as the world’s biggest sponsor of state terrorism – invoking its Islamic rulers’ supposed revolutionary fanaticism and determined support for militant proxies.

Now a long-standing but mainly latent threat is coalescing, with the war waged on the country by the US and Israel, to raise the risk of an attack on American soil to levels unseen since the murderous al-Qaida assaults of 11 September 2001, experts say.

In an election year, opponents of Donald Trump are warning that such an event could rebound to his advantage – providing him with a pretext to crack down on critics by declaring a state of emergency or even cancelling November’s congressional midterm elections.

Two attacks on Thursday alone illustrated the heightened dangers.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They need a 9/11 style support for war.

They want this.

But irans plan is literally laid out. They're doing everything they e said they'd do.

They're going to fuck us economically. It's going to get wild unless something wilder happens. Neither is good.

If there was another 9/11, Trump wouldn't be able to decide whether it was bad because America was attacked or good because he doesn't like New York City.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 17 points 8 hours ago

Likewise, a global economic crisis might also be the point. Would undermine China’s trade and growth, would help fascist parties in the west and give Trump an excuse to cancel or rig the elections because of a ‘crisis’

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Here comes another 9/11 and Oct7 to make things worse.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

From another post I made: “ I don’t think another 9/11 will unite Americans how they’re thinking it will this time. I can imagine he thinks that there will be a grand incident in the US and everyone will unite behind him as our savior to stomp down the “big baddie” and he’ll be looked at as a hero.

That’s not gonna work this time. He’s too hated and will be looked at as the one who caused it and fracture even more. You can’t play that card twice. ”

[–] ZiggyTheZygote@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Dude elections aren’t going to be canceled. That idiot can try but states do what they want by design.

People need to stop saying this, or at least say every time that they can try it but it’s not going to work.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 59 minutes ago

It can't happen here.

-Person to whom it will happen.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

You're still assuming that legality means anything to them. So far, they have been trying to maintain a fig leaf of legitimacy, but that could change at any point. If the military obeys Trump's illegal orders, he can override or ignore any law, up to and including the Constitution. Laws only have meaning if they are enforced. That has not been happening for a while now.

Trump has the capability to send troops to seize state capitals, or to bomb them, or to arrest state governors and legislators. We all hope he won't, but what is going to prevent it if he tries?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They gave someone on a terrorist watch list a VISA just sona CI could never leave his side till the FBI picked him up for an "assassination plt" the CI planned and the guy on the list wasn't even into.

The only thing crazier than that, would be thinking it wasn't done once.