this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
906 points (99.0% liked)

Comic Strips

22751 readers
2665 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world -1 points 56 minutes ago

Four bucks per hour laughing at nineteen bucks an hour?

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The book 'Freakomomics' deals, among many others, with the similarities between a corporate giant and a regular criminal organisation. In short, petty criminals risk death or prison for only two reasons: a) they feel they have no other choice and b) they are hoping, one day, to become part of the top members. That's about it. Think about it for a while and the argument is easily transposed to the '''legal''' corporate world, which also explains why middle managers tend to be obedient assholes who, instead of being mad at those exploiting them, exploit their underlings themselves.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

"We don't want to end the exploitation. We want to become the exploiters!" - Rom, DS9 "Bar Association".

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

50/hr guy is not welcome in my home, not because of his class but because I don't like bootlickers and that's a bootlicker right there.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 19 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 minutes ago

Financial obesity? More like socioeconomic cancer.

It's not just an excess of adipose tissue. It's a malignant tumor, and it's capable of metastasizing. It's already in society's lymph. We're cooked.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Where I live, in Washington state, there isn't an income tax however, finally they're implementing one on people making over 1M/yr. There were people out protesting that definitely don't make 1M/yr. It's wild.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

I had a boss years ago who owned a temporary agency, and I had the pleasure of watching him berate his two receptionists -- who made $7 an hour and who had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the success of the business -- because his monthly income from the business had dropped from $40,000 to $25,000. Meanwhile he spent his entire day playing solitaire and listening to the Rush Limbaugh show.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Every time someone blames left vs right, Dems vs GOP, this is what I think of. It is really the consolidation of income and wealth with the very few at the top that is the problem.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fascist use whatever ideology gets them more power. Racism today and Gay Rights tomorrow.

If you can't see beyond the propaganda you will never understand what is happening.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

no thats pragmatism, fascists believe on hierarchy of power and nothing more, everything else is pretext to get whatever they want done, much like you had suggested in the latter half of your comment.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No that is conservative, but I see where you are going.

[–] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

The CEO of my company makes almost $40,000 a day and all he has to do is play kissyface with congressmen.

The mouse at by shared office computer still has a fucking ball in it.

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Can we get a picture of the mouse?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The problem I see is that rich old man has a lot of cash, and governments compete globally for that mans investment dollars. If you tax him theres some euclidean point where it no longer makes sense to invest.

If you're talking about taxing a person making 1 million dollars 75% and taking away 750k is that really fair? If you're some kind of genius programmer or CEO who went to Harvard would you stay for 25%?

We need to remove the tax loophole that people like Elon Musk use, where they borrow money to avoid paying taxes.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 47 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If Elon Musk finds a $100 bill in the street, it isn't worth his time to pick it up

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 minutes ago

If you have $100,000, then $1 is worth about as much to you (relative to your net worth) as $1,000,000 is to someone with $100,000,000,000...

Let that sink in, and then ask yourself why billionaires don't pay more taxes...

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 35 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Meanwhile, if your yearly salary is less than $315,360 it is worth your time to pick up a penny.

mathAssume picking up a penny takes one second. There are 31536000 seconds in a year (roughly, let's not get into leap seconds). Multiply that by $.01, the value of a penny. Then you get the salary such that across the year you're making a penny every second. A caveat to this is that even if you're making more than this you need to debate what "worth your time" means because it's still a penny you wouldn't have either way, but I think this is enough to illustrate the wealth gap.

Small edit: To add to that last point, what I mean is that it's not like you stop earning your yearly salary while you're picking up a penny.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Unless picking up the bill stops someone from earning for some reason, most people should earn their hourly wage plus $100

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Is this part not showing for you or did you just miss it?

Small edit: To add to that last point, what I mean is that it's not like you stop earning your yearly salary while you're picking up a penny.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

That’s what I meant as well - we are saying the same thing. I think I misread your comment as that being the threshold to make it worth it. Don’t mind me, my brain is mush after work lol

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Picking up a penny takes way longer than one second! At least 5, if it includes stopping, and even longer if you check it out and put it in your wallet!

😁

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I'd have to include another 30 seconds to unlock my phone and search something like "is 1956 penny worth anything", then another 20 seconds for disappointed reflecting.

[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Although a dog may have peed on it, so wash your hands!

source: owner of a dog that proudly pees on any foreign item on the street.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 13 hours ago

If you're making less than $300k, can you really complain about your money covered in dog piss? /s hopefully obviously lol

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 77 points 1 day ago (5 children)

How does this work when the capitalists working hours are zero? You cant divide by 0?

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

If you're rich enough, you can pay people to try for you. Which, over relatively short time lines, is kinda like being able to.

[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 36 points 22 hours ago

It doesn't imply that he works for it, only that "he" makes that per hour.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›