this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
230 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

30412 readers
2381 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 16 points 3 hours ago

New address space unlocked

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 11 points 4 hours ago

For the uninitiated, the joke is:

spoilerEach number should has a maximum value of 255.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 44 points 5 hours ago

It's not often you see IPv5

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Sorry, that's my IP. I was trying something

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 38 points 7 hours ago

In addition to what others have already posted, I suspect that this might be an attempt to evade spam/phishing filters that are looking for an IP address with a specific regular expression. Having a fake IP address that doesn’t match the traditional ^((25\[0-5]|(2\[0-4]|1\d|\[1-9]|)\d)\\.?\b){4}$ format might let this message slip through.

[–] shawn@thagoat.org 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

That cancer support line should buy this one also

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 95 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

I often assume this kind of thing is part of an effort to filter for idiots

If you know that's an invalid IP address, you're probably less likely to fall for the scam after the scammer has put the setup work in. So if they filter you out before a scammer has to spend any actual effort on you, that means more time they can spend scamming people who might be more likely to fall for it

That's why these things often have egregious spelling errors and other seemingly obvious red flags

[–] zo0@programming.dev 35 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Just because I know what a valid IP is doesn't mean I'm not an idiot 😎

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Let's see you write a regex for one, then we'll decide.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 41 minutes ago

Why would anyone want to do that when there are dozens on stackoverflow?

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 7 hours ago

That's not the probability they are looking for.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 39 points 9 hours ago

I do believe that is confirmed canon.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's possible in general, but I don't think that's what's going on specifically here; not many people read IP addresses in such detail to notice such things at first glance.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 7 points 8 hours ago

It’s exactly what is happening, they’re filtering out people who know what an IP address is and can contain so that they get fewer time wasters.

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 14 points 9 hours ago

Movies and TV shows actually do it this way to prevent actual machines getting group hugged.

Like in that one X-Files episode, where the Lone Gunmen hack into an invalid IP.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 6 points 9 hours ago

It's also why there's usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 108 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, that’s the new hexadecimal IPV8

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

IPv4 was easy to remember. IPv6 made it very hard. This implies that IPv8 has to be base64 encoded.

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hello, I am apparently an idiot. What is wrong with that IP address that people can tell it's an immediate phishing scam?

[–] Turious@leaf.dance 24 points 7 hours ago

IP addresses can't have segment numbers going over 255.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago
[–] dracs@programming.dev 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I try to avoid "this" style comments, but I genuinely don't know how else to respond to this one. It was hilarious. I literally (by which I actually mean "literally") laughed out loud.

[–] ghodawalaaman@programming.dev 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

wait what? I feel like I am left behind in the tech. I only know about ipv4 and ipv6 😭😭😭

[–] tyler@programming.dev 39 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They’re making a joke. The numbers in the IP are way too high for v4, but the format isn’t v6, so it’s a “new range” of v8.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

In the drawer right next to IPv5

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 6 points 9 hours ago

at 192.512.512.10.0/42.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago

Jesus Christ, that’s Jason Bourne’s IP address!

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm more surprised that it's a normal UA instead of something like AppleWebkit/Gecko/ChromeSafari 547.0

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Your first mistake is sharing this email with everyone here

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 hours ago

Please, do not share the button. It's gross.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Probably outer space