this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
13 points (88.2% liked)

Programming

26102 readers
942 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So some backstory here: I’m pretty much anti-AI, but I try to stay on top of things so I can make informed recommendations to leadership. Recently , they’ve come to me interested in using Replit “because it’s so easy” and they almost have a site built out how they want.

Besides the fact that it’s managed to blow up and nuke production, what are some pros/cons about it? I’m worried about things like BCDR, vulnerability scanning, separation of duties, etc. You know all the base things you should have in place too.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Since I've never talked an idiot out of doing something stupid, I focus on selling them my help "deploying" it.

My amazing skills can help their stupid shit make it past security and legal, at the low low cost of sometimes a quiet complete re-write.

It usually works because idiots are also bad at mathb (or just magic thinking, carefully ignoring that their stupid added more cost than it saved.)

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

managed to blow up and nuke production

test in AI production

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 10 hours ago

Pros: leadership wants to do your job. Chill out, let them do it, then laugh at them when it fails. You'll at least have a relaxing job up until they either fire you in their idiotic confidence or beg you for help.

Cons:

it's managed to blow up and nuke production

You know, I remember reading a similar story about AWS recently...

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

There are no pros since they wrecked a database. You should instantly find anything else.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Give them enough rope to hang themselves. They'll learn the hard way.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Forget replit specifically, what problem are they trying to solve? Leadership shouldn't dictate the solution but define a problem that needs solving.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Valid question, but leadership is technical enough to cause trouble and this is a smaller company that values fast right now.

I’m working within constraints for now before pushing cultural fixes.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

I would still say that the solution depends on what they're trying to achieve, and what their priorities are. Maybe Replit is a good solution if they want something to create a quick proof of concept. Rather than commit to just one platform/solution, maybe it's worth doing a 1-3month trial on Replit to help uncover what some of the pros/cons are.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

we once lost a contract to build a service from scratch because the team didn't have enough experience with aws lambda.

there was no stack, no legacy code. the pitch was basically "onlyfans but sfw", with no further details. as a team we had about 80 years of experience. all seniors. but no, they wanted experience with lambdas.

[–] Bibip@programming.dev 4 points 22 hours ago

a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing