this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
91 points (88.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8921 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Social media created an immediate soap box for everyone, and a way for unhealthy ideas to propagate quicker and more virally. It encourages vanity, inhibition, and unrealistic expectations. Then there's the whole corporate element, where the mainstream of these platforms are truly just systems of data collection and manipulation.
  • Dead internet theory coming in nicely
  • The early advent of the internet had high hopes it would be used for the sharing of information. It indeed is, but the most widely used search engines are weighted to point you towards curated and questionable sources of information. This is purposeful, and often capitalistically motivated versus educational.
  • There's more, but I'm tired and didn't expect to type all this out, so I'll leave it for the comments.
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echo@lemmy.today 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Internet is not a place. It doesn't have weather or climate. It doesn't have AQI. It has no life. It is not a destination or someplace you can go to.

The Internet provides a means of communication. As usual, capitalism and awful people use it to facilitate their twisted, greedy, and hateful purposes.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which is obvious. Once given to the public that was an an obvious direction to go. Even when I was a kid I was aware of neo-nazi sites as far back as the very early 90's. What I wasn't aware of was loving, welcoming places. Hate finds a way to move faster and fill in gaps better than love. Like if hate is water, love is jello.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Mmm, jello...

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Eloquent. I have but one vote.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 31 points 5 days ago

By the internet you mean social media?

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

You are talking about a piece of the internet. The commercial one.... Not the rest

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Internet has arguably saved now lives than it's taken. You have to remember the Internet is also the backbone that hospitals and researchers use to share data and research. social media and bad/malicious journalism has had a terribly negative effect, but that's a subset of the entire Internet. It's like saying electricity is bad because it provides am infrastructure for bad things to happen, placing the blame on the infrastructure rather the individuals (or corporations) that are doing the bad thing.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Juuuuust wait for measles and get back to us. Or. Remember covid. You couldn't be more wrong. You could also say "More" instead of now. Still wholly incorrect.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Measles and Covid were spread by the Internet? I remember hearing a bunch of misinformation spread in TV broadcasts. I remember RFK changing the vaccination recommendations. I remember reading far more factual information online than false on both of those topics. The nature of pandemics is they kill people. Shitty people can't be bothered to listen to reason, even though they were told and showed the facts. The Internet is just one medium that information is disseminated, but the bigger factors are the likes of FOX news and other 24/7 news stations.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So you agree. Vaccines saved people, not the internet, but the web leads people into echo chambers and rabbit holes, doing the exact opposite. Thanks.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's one medium that can lead people to misinformation, but the pros far outweigh the cons. Education, sharing of vital information in real time, communication, and connections before unavailable with friends and relatives exist because of the Internet. It's rapidly being policies down a dark rabbit hole of shit policies. Blaming bad journalism and bad actors on the Internet is like blaming the roads when someone is killed by a drunk driver.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If only there were things like education, books, etc.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

They do exist but they're not as easily accessible. I remember reading through the dated information of encyclopedias doing projects in school. Information on the Internet is readily available and updated in a timely manner as new information is gathered.

There are also plenty of books and other education resources that are full of bad information. There are many things taught in schools that aren't true.

The source of information is the problem, not the medium it lives on.

[–] citizensongbird@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pro: All the world's knowledge and information in the palm of your hand.

Con: Set up like a disorganized library, requiring a basic foundation of intelligence, education, wisdom, and skepticism to know how to find and then parse good info from bad.

Pro: Has facilitated sharing of vital knowledge between experts and laymen.

Con: Has allowed idiots, statistically few and far between scattered across the world, to unionize.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The internet is not the same thing as large corporate social media platforms.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago

Not fully, not yet

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Really don't understand why so many commenters here say it's just a part of the internet...

No? There was a time XMPP connected me to most my fiends, whether they had Facebook Messenger, Google, ... And these days it's all WhatsApp.

E-Mails used to be a thing. But now my bank and half the businesses refuse to communicate via email and I get 20 apps and logins to various mailboxes to spend an hour each month to fetch my bills. While my eMail inbox is all spam.

Forums and Blogs were a thing, but they're mainly displaced by Discord, and everyone writing for a more general audience is on big-tech platforms or Medium.

The internet got way more centralized. From DNS to half the (still existing) independent websites who all homed in on Cloudflare... So even the infrastructure of the internet changed. They also do less open network exchanges and traffic gets moved it to private interchanges. And the whole internet was devised to be a very diverse and kinda open network. Now 90% of it is 5 big companies.

And you pretty much can't google anything anymore. In the old days I'd just ask Google what the error message on my phone means, or if my Dell laptop can take a 32GB RAM stick (despite it not being listed in the compatibility list). And I'd regularly find good answers. Not so much as of today. I'll get 10 results written by some AI harvesting my clicks and that's it. The proper answer written by some random person on Reddit or somwhere else is gone.

It's really not just the www or social media. It's everywhere.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, even in the last decade this has steadily gotten worse. It feels like more and more things are being forcibly centralised for express purpose of making data harvesting easier - and the people doing it aren't even really trying to hide it either.

[–] mech@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You're talking only about the world wide web, not the internet. Unless you want to go back to snail mail and phone switchboard operators for global communication.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I don't want any communication to be honest. I get just as much junk mail irl as I do in email. I only recently stopped getting 5 calls a day from scammers because I assume they got busted. I don't even want switchboards. I want to be left the fuck alone.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Rule 6. Please provide with some reasons.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Rule 6? I'm here for the rule 34!

........oh, I guess I just became your source of rule 6.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Just explain why you want rule 34. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I mean......do I need more of an explaination besides "Boobs"?

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

Sorry, I missed that one. Please give me a few moments to update the post body.

This is one of those times when Lemmy users act like they are different and better than everyone else. But it doesn't take a lot of time to find people being toxic on Lemmy.

Hell, I started to sporadically use Instagram again because of friends and - at least in regards to what I see - it's a much happier less toxic place than this. Not great, plenty of things I could criticize, but I can handle being there a lot longer. But everyone just wants to throw blame at corps and judge themselves free of any wrongdoing. Same behavior as when it comes to climate and environmentalism.

This place started with the intent of being different and better than reddit, but now it's almost indistinguishable in terms of user behavior and attitude. Everything is an argument, everything is a fight, everyone knows better than everyone else and acts condescendingly.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The internet is an amplifier. If you were going to be stupid locally, it enables you to be stupid at a global scale. If you were already going to be greedy, you can be greedy at a global scale. If you were going to be gullible, horny, angry, sad, spiteful, kind, contemplative, quiet, loud, and so on, and so on...

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

horny, ... sad

I'm surprised you were able to find my blog in your search results.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not the internet, per se. It's the corpo owned hell pits of engagement time, data-mining, targeted advertising, and metrics that's to blame. Forums were pretty cool. Had some bad experiences there, but nowhere near as bad as today.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago

Those corpo hell pits are completely in bed with lawmakers, and are now rewriting the rules. They will do all they can to stamp out all corners of the free internet.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

Dunno how unpopular that opinion is, because it's becoming more and more factually correct each day. Hell, actual counterculture nowadays is avoiding the internet

I often find myself wondering why I spend so much time on lemmy. Not being corpo bullshit doesn't automatically make it good. "Not as bad" can still be bad, like how 1g of lead is "not as bad" for your health as 1g of polonium

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

Very unpopular, upvoted. Unlike most things that are gatekept by the rich, anyone with an internet connection has access to most of the same content...

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 days ago

I completely agree yet I'm still here injecting it directly into my veins to avoid feeling stuff.

Do you also feel this pertains to Fediverse despite the lack of direct corporate influence? Or do you think this is different?

[–] sox@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Dead internet theory

I can't even find any information. All the search engine offers me are websites with copied text by AI.

The only place where I can find something useful is forums and personal blogs.

The Internet is not about people and community, but about making money :(

[–] mcSlibinas@lemmy.world -4 points 5 days ago

Just like almost any city irl.