this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
20 points (83.3% liked)

Programming

26193 readers
145 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 hours ago

This is stupid and defeatest. Just write code without agents no one is stopping you.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 20 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

What's with all these articles assuming some fictional reality that coding is replaced by LLMs now? Find me a tool that can build any software anyone wants to build, then ask yourself if you trust that tool to do your taxes for you (if you're in the US anyway), book an entire 3 week $10k vacation for you, manage your finances and set budgets for you, and so on.

What software does the author think people will build with these tools that's "fast fashion" style slop? Even assuming a non-coder wants some random one-off software for something, in what world would they ask a LLM to write it for them rather than look for an existing program that does what they want?

In the dev world, LLMs have proven that they cannot build production-quality software by themselves. They can build pretty demos maybe, but everything from Amazon's tool recreating prod to whatever the fuck the Windows devs are doing shows that trusting an LLM to work on real software will eventually backfire.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago

The author's own work has transitioned to mostly directing LLMs now - see their earlier posts.

(They're fairly prolific too - used to run PouchDB IIRC, and the Pinafore Mastodon client.)

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My work has been pushing BMAD method hard on us software engineers and while I do agree using those prompts, scaffolding, and alot of babysitting, you can get fairly good results - it takes more effort than actually just writing the code.

Devs are going to get lazy and stop handholding and steering the LLMs, and since we're now looping LLMs into code review, it's going to miss stuff as well.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago

BMAD? Be Mad? Bet my ass on drugs? Bro Man App Dawg? Business Minded AIDs Design?

[–] Ogeon@programming.dev 2 points 8 hours ago

Maybe they are trying to manifest its death by arranging its funeral over and over. Programming as an art form isn't more dead than painting as an art form, as long as people want to do it. However, as the blog post hints at, what you produce for work wasn't perhaps ever meant to be a work of art. You aren't necessarily going to be able to write code in your favorite style for work anyway, unless you can influence it and decide the conventions. That has been true since forever in larger organisations.

Props to the blog author for seeking out new experiences in their free time but what they are mourning is either still there (just write your art code) or they have just had to adjust to their new trade-off. Don't be surprised when it doesn't feel artistic if you don't spend any effort on the process.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Codeinabox specifically seeks them out to post them here to push their narrative.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not gonna assume a motivation, but yes I have noticed that whenever I wonder “Wow, this reads like the author got oneshotted. Who posted this?” it is codeinabox.

[–] codeinabox@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for not assuming my motivations. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by "oneshotted"? I share a lot of articles, so I'm not surprised you recognise my username.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, the unfortunate reality is that nobody ever remembers your name on the good posts.

“Oneshotted” apparently originated from hallucinogens — the rare but sad occurrence where people try them once and then completely lose their minds.

But I’ve mostly seen it in the context of LLMs, where it means basically the same thing.

(Also: why did someone downvote your reply?)

[–] codeinabox@programming.dev -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't specifically seek them out. I follow quite a few different programming blogs, and I am just sharing what people are posting about, and it just so happens a lot of people are posting about this topic.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

A lot of marketers are hyping their product by making these outlandish claims that it's better than it is and will drive so many costly developers out of work