this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
42 points (95.7% liked)

News

36714 readers
2268 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Contractors are installing a 17-mile stretch of cylindrical buoys in the river to prevent illegal crossings from Mexico. These are the first of 536 miles of buoys that the federal government plans to stretch from the Gulf of Mexico deep into South Texas. The Department of Homeland Security has waived environmental laws and issued more than $1 billion in contracts to private companies to install them in continuous chains. Each industrial-style buoy is more than 12 feet long and four to five feet in diameter.

...

Experts consulted by Inside Climate News said they knew of no comparable undertaking on a dynamic river anywhere in the world. They warned that the buoys could speed up flood water in a region that already struggles with flooding. The buoys could also accumulate sediment and create new landforms in the river, provoking treaty disputes with neighboring Mexico. The buoys are planned through Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, Zapata, Webb, Maverick and Val Verde counties.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Also please note that 70% of people here illegally are due to visa overstaying from a tourist visa. They flew here.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Has anyone ever played this video for PEDOnald and his stupid base?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wk6rswxQro

[–] Coyote@piefed.ca 7 points 16 hours ago

“It is inevitable that portions of the buoy system will break free and portions of the [border] wall will fail,” he wrote.

“Even very small changes can have very big consequences,” Tompkins told the Laredo committee.

----

Shaking my head in advance.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago

America spending money on useless shit instead of spending money on its poor yet again

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

Fucking hell. Not discounting the deadly consequences to immigrants but gosh what fresh ecological hell will these exert on the already stressed ecosystem there.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Are people still crossing? Wtf would they do that?

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago

This is all in preparation to prevent people from leaving the hellscape the US will become.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Why is it even necessary? Border crossings are at a historic low. If necessary, just put up concertina wire. These can be easily removed when no longer needed.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Trying to keep us in?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Why is it even necessary?

First off, it lines a few friendly contractors' pockets to the tune of $3B.

Second off, you get to parade around at the border in front of some big metal tubes to announce "Mission Accomplished!" for your constituents.

[–] Jaegeras@piefed.social 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Um, but they will swim under them?

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

So.. there have been some bouys like this and underneath they put nets and lined the shore with razor wire. Some of them have circular saw blades on them. I’m sure there’s other horrible things I could dredge up but you get the idea.

They know about the swimming and have accounted for it in the most horrific way possible.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Easy to get trapped or killed doing that sort of thing. They're very big and it's shallow water.

Also, security officers and vigilantes on the far shore have a history of just shooting you.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Actually, Texas slapped barbed wire on the underside of these when they put them up. I feel like the feds might do the same.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, but how are these things changing that? Whether they swim under or cross the river without these things, people with guns are factors already there. If it's too shallow to swim under you can easily climb over. The diameter is 1.5m and they are floating. They are less than 0.5m below the surface max, so if it's really that shallow even a young kid can just stand there and climb over. If it's 0.5m clearance under it it's less than a 5sec swim underneath.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Go down and give it a shot. Let us know if it's as easy as you thought

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh hell no! Not a chance I'm going to that fascist country. I'm happy on the other side of the pond.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you're not saying that from England.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed I'm not. But there are ~160 countries across 2 ponds. Not just England.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

They already got in trouble for this during this regimes first term

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago